LEADER 04996nam 2200649 450 001 9910797216003321 005 20230807221004.0 010 $a90-272-6828-2 035 $a(CKB)3710000000441651 035 $a(EBL)2083576 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001517740 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12565172 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001517740 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11504984 035 $a(PQKB)10361738 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16037705 035 $a(PQKB)20339655 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC2083576 035 $a(DLC) 2015017629 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000441651 100 $a20150715h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aProto-Indo-European syntax and its development /$fedited by Leonid Kulikov, Nikolaos Lavidas 210 1$aAmsterdam, Netherlands ;$aPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d2015. 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (164 p.) 225 1 $aBenjamins Current Topics,$x1874-0081 ;$vVolume 75 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-4263-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. 327 $aProto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Preface; References; Reconstructing Proto-Indo-European categories; 1. Introduction; 2. Reflexivity and the Middle in IE languages; 3. Focusing on Hittite -z; 3.1 Functions of the middle/reflexive -z; 3.2 The data; 3.2.1 First group: Transitive reflexive; 3.2.2 Second group: Subjective reflexive; 3.2.3 Third group: Objective reflexive; 4. Functional extension of reflexive constructions in IE languages; 5. Reconstructing the PIE category 'Middle'; 6. Conclusions; References 327 $aThe rise of 'subordination features' in the history of Greek and their decline1. Introduction; 2. The problem; 3. The distinction root vs. non-root clauses; 4. Pre-Classical Greek; 4.1 Stage a and subordinating conjunctions (T1): Genesis of complementizers; 4.2 Stage a: Tense shift (T4) instead of mood shift (T3); 5. Classical Greek: Stage b and the system of subordination traits; 5.1 Stage b: Subordinating conjunctions (T1) pertaining to the complementizer ho?ti; 5.2 Stage b: Infinitival complement clauses (T0); 5.3 Stage b: Mood shift (T3) 327 $a3.1 General typological issues3.1.1 Lehmann vs. Friedrich; 3.1.2 Subordination and the finiteness constraint; 3.2 Finite relativization and SOV; 3.3 Some special features of early relative-correlatives; 3.4 Apparent difficulties; 3.4.1 "Replacive" relative clauses; 3.4.2 Old Hittite "embedded" relatives; 3.5 Conclusions regarding relativization; 4. Prosodically motivated changes confirming the verb-final reconstruction; 4.1 Suprasegmental effects of verb finality; 4.2 Segmental effects of verb finality; 4.3 Verb-finality effects as evidence that the SOV reconstruction is a fruitful hypothesis 327 $a5. Summary and conclusionsAbbreviations; References; Hittite pai- 'come' and uwa- 'go' as Restructuring Verbs; 1. Introduction; 2. The Hittite phraseological construction; 3. Restructuring and Clitic Climbing; 4. The phraseological construction as an instance of Restructuring; 4.1 Restructuring and finite clauses; 4.2 The position of the matrix verb; 4.3 uwa- as a raising verb; 5. Conclusion; References; Reconstructing passive and voice in Proto-Indo-European; 1. Introduction; 2. Background; 2.1 Passive and Passivization; 2.2 The passive in ancient Indo-European languages 327 $a3. Lack of specialized passive morphology in IE: Evidence from Greek 330 $aThe Parametric Comparison Method (PCM, Guardiano & Longobardi 2005, Longobardi & Guardiano 2009) is grounded on the assumption that syntactic parameters are more appropriate than other traits for use as comparanda for historical reconstruction, because they are able to provide unambiguous correspondences and objective measurements, thus guaranteeing wide-range applicability and quantitative exactness. This article discusses a set of experiments explicitly designed to evaluate the impact of parametric syntax in representing historical relatedness, and performed on a selection of 26 contemporary 410 0$aBenjamins current topics ;$vVolume 75. 606 $aProto-Indo-European language$xSyntax 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax 606 $aLanguage acquisition 615 0$aProto-Indo-European language$xSyntax. 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax. 615 0$aLanguage acquisition. 676 $a415 702 $aKulikov$b L. I. 702 $aLavidas$b Nikolaos 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910797216003321 996 $aProto-Indo-European syntax and its development$93850470 997 $aUNINA