LEADER 05647nam 2200685 450 001 9910797050903321 005 20230807214048.0 010 $a90-272-6910-6 035 $a(CKB)3710000000375758 035 $a(EBL)1987946 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001438864 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12623913 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001438864 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11396286 035 $a(PQKB)11300917 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16039517 035 $a(PQKB)23024481 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1987946 035 $a(DLC) 2014040125 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000375758 100 $a20150416h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe syntax of multiple-que sentences in Spanish $ealong the left periphery /$fJulio Villa-Garci?a, Villanova University 210 1$aAmsterdam, The Netherlands ;$aPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d2015. 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (290 p.) 225 1 $aIssues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics,$x2213-3887 ;$vVolume 2 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-336-21959-9 311 $a90-272-5801-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aEditorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Preface; List of abbreviations; Introduction; 1. Theoretical and empirical scope of this volume; 2. The fine structure of the left periphery; 3. Major claims of this volume; 3.1 Against a processing account of double-complementizer sentences in Spanish; 3.2 A note on terminology; 4. Organization of the book; Toward a syntactic analysis of Spanish recomplementation; 1. Introduction; 2. The phenomenon of recomplementation; 2.1 Other types of non-high que; 3. Properties of recomplementation configurations 327 $a3.1 The constituents sandwiched between ques are left-dislocated3.2 Distributional properties of recomplementation que; 3.2.1 Multiple instances of sandwiched left-dislocation; 3.2.2 On the iterative nature of recomplementation que; 3.2.3 Non-dislocated left-peripheral XPs cannot appear to the left of recomplementation que; 3.3 Selection and recomplementation que; 3.4 Recomplementation que blocks movement across it; 3.5 On the relationship between the sandwiched dislocated phrase and recomplementation que; 3.5.1 *Que que sequences? 327 $a3.5.2 The sandwiched XP and recomplementation que stand in a Spec-Head relationship3.5.2.1 Polarity and recomplementation. In recent work, Garrett (2013) provides empirical support for the claim put forth here that both the sandwiched XP and recomplementation que are topic-related entities. The author applies a test for topichood devise; 3.5.2.2 Ellipsis and recomplementation. As noted above, Paoli (2006) claims that the second que in Romance recomplementation agrees with an element in its specifier, an intuition already expressed in Uriagereka (1995a). I have also shown that Saramaccan a 327 $a4. Evaluating the existing accounts of recomplementation4.1 Existing proposals; 4.1.1 CP recursion; 4.1.2 Recomplementation que in FP; 4.1.3 Proposals within Rizzi's split-CP system; 4.1.3.1 Recomplementation que in FinitenessP. A number of proposals assume that optional secondary que heads FinitenessP, while the high, obligatory que characteristic of embedded declarative clauses heads ForceP, the two complementizers serving to delimi 327 $a4.1.3.2 No TopicP/FocusP: Recomplementation que in FinitenessP. A modified version of the FinitenessP analysis of recomplementation is put forward in Lo?pez (2009a, b). For Lo?pez, projections such as TopicP and FocusP should be dispensed with, but the Forc4.1.3.3 Recomplementation que in DiscourseP. In the spirit of the streamlined NoTopicP/FocusP proposal advocated in Lo?pez (2009a), Kempchinsky (2013) acknowledges that it is necessary to assume that ForceP and FinitenessP frame yet another projection for 327 $a4.1.3.4 Recomplementation que in (Doubled)ForceP. The analysis first laid out in Marti?n-Gonza?lez (2002) assumes that secondary que in recomplementation contexts heads a projection which he calls (Doubled)ForceP, sandwiched between TopicP and FinitenessP: 330 $aComplementizers offer a window into the architecture of the left-periphery and further our understanding of the demarcation of the boundaries between the C(omplementizer) and T(ense) domains. Using the articulated left-periphery as a laboratory and Spanish constructions featuring more than one complementizer as a point of departure, the author delivers new insights into the syntactic positions and behavior of Spanish complementizer que along the left edge. These observations have far-reaching consequences to such fundamental linguistic concepts as the derivation of left dislocations, ellipsis, 410 0$aIssues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics ;$vVolume 2. 606 $aSpanish language$xSyntax 606 $aSpanish language$xWord order 606 $aSpanish language$xClitics 606 $aSpanish language$xClauses 615 0$aSpanish language$xSyntax. 615 0$aSpanish language$xWord order. 615 0$aSpanish language$xClitics. 615 0$aSpanish language$xClauses. 676 $a465 700 $aVilla-Garci?a$b Julio$01541066 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910797050903321 996 $aThe syntax of multiple-que sentences in Spanish$93793025 997 $aUNINA