LEADER 03408nam 2200541 450 001 9910796973803321 005 20230814223055.0 010 $a3-11-057492-6 010 $a3-11-057607-4 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110576078 035 $a(CKB)4100000005043737 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5157486 035 $a(DE-B1597)489429 035 $a(OCoLC)1046614167 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110576078 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5157486 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11605165 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000005043737 100 $a20180921d2018 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe aesthetic use of the logical functions in Kant's third Critique /$fStephanie Adair 210 1$aBerlin ;$aBoston :$cDe Gruyter,$d[2018] 210 4$d©2018 215 $a1 online resource (314 pages) 225 0 $aKantstudien-Ergänzungshefte ;$v202 311 $a3-11-057479-9 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tAcknowledgement -- $tContents -- $tList of Abbreviations -- $tIntroduction -- $tChapter One: Renegotiating Kantian Constraints, Intuiting without Concepts -- $tChapter Two: Logical Functions of Judgment and the Layered Solution -- $tChapter Three: Pleasure Without Interest: Affirming a Negated Interest Through the Infinite Logical Function of Quality -- $tChapter Four: The Universal Validity of a Singular Judgment -- $tChapter Five: Disjunctivity and the Form of Purposiveness -- $tChapter Six: An Exemplary, Conditioned Necessity -- $tConcluding Remarks -- $tWorks Cited -- $tAbstract -- $tIndex 330 $aIn the third Critique Kant details an aesthetic operation of judgment that is surprising considering how judgment functioned in the first Critique. In this book, I defend an understanding of Kant's theory of Geschmacksurteil as detailing an operation of the faculties that does not violate the cognitive structure laid out in the first Critique. My orientation is primarily epistemological, elaborating the determinations that govern the activity of pure aesthetic judging that specify it as a "bestimmte" type of judgment without transforming it into "ein bestimmendes Urteil". I focus on identifying how the logical functions from the table of judgments operate in the pure aesthetic judgment of taste to reveal "the moments to which this power of judgment attends in its reflection" (CPJ, 5:203). In the course of doing so, a picture emerges of how the world is not just cognizable in a Kantian framework but also charged with human feeling, acquiring the inexhaustible, inchoate meaningfulness that incites "much thinking" (CPJ, 5:315). The universal communicability of aesthetic pleasure serves as the foundation that grounds robust intersubjective relations, enabling genuine connection to others through a shared a priori feeling. 606 $aJudgment (Aesthetics) 606 $aJudgment (Logic) 610 $aKant, Immanuel. 610 $aaesthetics. 610 $aepistemology. 615 0$aJudgment (Aesthetics) 615 0$aJudgment (Logic) 676 $a111.85092 700 $aAdair$b Stephanie$01468986 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910796973803321 996 $aThe aesthetic use of the logical functions in Kant's third Critique$93801723 997 $aUNINA