LEADER 03256nam 2200589 450 001 9910796626003321 005 20230814221602.0 010 $a1-5015-0767-2 024 7 $a10.1515/9781501507731 035 $a(CKB)4100000001965716 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5157894 035 $a(DE-B1597)488980 035 $a(OCoLC)1020699569 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781501507731 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5157894 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11500896 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000001965716 100 $a20180210h20182018 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aCognitive pragmatics $emindreading, inferences, consciousness /$fMarco Mazzone 210 1$aBerlin, [Germany] ;$aBoston, [Massachusetts] :$cDe Gruyter,$d2018. 210 4$dİ2018 215 $a1 online resource (194 pages) 225 1 $aMouton Series in Pragmatics ;$vVolume 20 311 $a1-5015-1612-4 311 $a1-5015-0773-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tTable of contents -- $tIntroduction -- $t1 Relevance -- $t2 Associative and inferential processes -- $t3 Automatic and controlled processes -- $t4 Mindreading, pragmatics, and modularity -- $t5 Rational and cognitive: an opposition? -- $tConclusions -- $tReferences -- $tName index -- $tSubject index 330 $aCognitive pragmatics is a mature field of research, characterized by robust theories and a growing amount of experimental work. In particular, Relevance Theory has provided a rich framework for research in the field. However, this theory makes a number of assumptions that are rooted in a modular view of cognition. This book provides a detailed analysis of such assumptions, arguing for an alternative model which has, however, some support in ideas explored by relevance theorists. First of all, inferences are explained in terms of associative pattern completion within associative networks, based on the schematic organization of memory. This explanation is shown to apply to a number of cognitive domains besides pragmatics, including mindreading. Moreover, such a view is compatible with a general understanding of the neurocomputational machinery of our cortex, suggesting a general argument to the effect that modularity in its standard version cannot be right. Second, the book argues for a crucial role of conscious attention in pragmatics as well as in most cognitive processes. In the end, what is proposed is not only a revision of Relevance Theory but also a fresh analysis of reasoning, which vindicates some Gricean intuitions. 410 0$aMouton series in pragmatics ;$vVolume 20. 606 $aPragmatics 606 $aCognitive psychology 610 $aGricean implicature. 610 $aInference. 610 $aMindreading. 610 $aRelevance Theory. 615 0$aPragmatics. 615 0$aCognitive psychology. 676 $a306.44 686 $aER 940$qSEPA$2rvk 700 $aMazzone$b Marco$0591917 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910796626003321 996 $aCognitive pragmatics$93807037 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03728nam 22006611c 450 001 9910784804103321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a1-4725-6016-7 010 $a1-281-35728-6 010 $a9786611357306 010 $a1-84731-398-1 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472560162 035 $a(CKB)1000000000408195 035 $a(EBL)342898 035 $a(OCoLC)476157076 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000189798 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11215606 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000189798 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10156792 035 $a(PQKB)10108844 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1772602 035 $a(OCoLC)646797008 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09255713 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC342898 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL342898 035 $a(iGPub)HARTB0000391 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000408195 100 $a20140929d2007 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aLaw and opinion in Scotland during the Seventeenth Century /$fJ.D. Ford 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aOxford ; Portland, OR $cHart Publishing $d2007. 215 $a1 online resource (662 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-84113-789-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [573]-637) and index 327 $a1 THE COLLEGE OF JUSTICE -- 2 THE INTERREGNUM COURT -- 3 THE COURT OF LAW -- 4 THE RESTORATION COURT -- 5 THE REVOLUTION COURT -- 6 THE COURT OF EQUITY 330 8 $aIn Britain at least, changes in the law are expected to be made by the enactment of statutes or the decision of cases by senior judges. Lawyers express opinions about the law but do not expect their opinions to form part of the law. It was not always so. This book explores the relationship between the opinions expressed by lawyers and the development of the law of Scotland in the century preceding the parliamentary union with England in 1707, when it was decided that the private law of Scotland was sufficiently distinctive and coherent to be worthy of preservation. Credit for this surprising decision, which has resulted in the survival of two separate legal systems in Britain, has often been given to the first Viscount Stair, whose Institutions of the Law of Scotland had appeared in a revised edition in 1693. The present book places Stair's treatise in historical context and asks whether it could have been his intention in writing to express the type of authoritative opinions that could have been used to consolidate the emerging law, and whether he could have been motivated in writing by a desire to clarify the relationship between the laws of Scotland and England. In doing so the book provides a fresh account of the literature and practice of Scots law in its formative period and at the same time sheds light on the background to the 1707 union. It will be of interest to legal historians and Scots lawyers, but it should also be accessible to lay readers who wish to know more about the law and legal history of Scotland 606 $aLaw$zScotland$xHistory$y17th century 606 $2Private / Civil law: general works 606 $aLegal opinions$zScotland$xHistory$y17th century 606 $aLaw$zScotland$xInterpretation and construction 615 0$aLaw$xHistory 615 0$aLegal opinions$xHistory 615 0$aLaw$xInterpretation and construction. 676 $a349.411 700 $aFord$b J. D$g(John Davidson)$05284 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910784804103321 996 $aLaw and opinion in Scotland during the Seventeenth Century$93779331 997 $aUNINA