LEADER 01208nam1 2200397 450 001 990003396170203316 005 20100511094905.0 035 $a000339617 035 $aUSA01000339617 035 $a(ALEPH)000339617USA01 035 $a000339617 100 $a20100510d1969----km-y0itay0103----ba 101 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $a||||||||001yy 200 1 $a<> grandi teologi del secolo ventesimo$fdi Battista Mondin 210 $aTorino$cBorla$d1969 215 $a2 v.$d21 cm 225 2 $a<> idee e la vita 410 $12001$a<> idee e la vita 461 1$1001-------$12001 463 \1$1001990003396200203316$12001 $a<<1.: I>> teologi cattolici 463 \1$1001990003396220203316$12001 $a<<2.: I>> teologi protestanti e ortodossi 606 0 $aTeologia$zSec. 20.$2BNCF 676 $a230.0904 700 1$aMONDIN,$bBattista$0156283 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990003396170203316 951 $aHR 792/1$b4753 DSA 951 $aHR 792/2$b4726 DSA 959 $aBK 969 $aDSA 979 $aDSA$b10$c20100510$lUSA01$h1139 979 $aDSA$b10$c20100511$lUSA01$h0949 996 $aGrandi teologi del secolo ventesimo$9153722 997 $aUNISA LEADER 01189nam 2200325 n 450 001 996384194703316 005 20221102114313.0 035 $a(CKB)1000000000590815 035 $a(EEBO)2240950354 035 $a(UnM)99871935 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000590815 100 $a19850522d1644 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||a|bb| 200 02$aA petition to the Kings Majesty$b[electronic resource] $eAlso a glorious victory, certified in a briefe relation of the totall routing of Prince Rvpert. And the taking of all his ordnance, armes and ammunition, bagge and baggage 210 $aLondon $cPrinted for F. L.$dIuly the 6th 1644 215 $a[2], 6 p 300 $areproduction of the original in the British Library. 330 $aeebo-0018 606 $aMarston Moor, Battle of, 1644$vEarly works to 1800 607 $aGreat Britain$xHistory$yCivil War, 1642-1649$xCampaigns$vEarly works to 1800 615 0$aMarston Moor, Battle of, 1644 801 0$bCu-RivES 801 1$bCu-RivES 801 2$bCStRLIN 801 2$bWaOLN 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996384194703316 996 $aA petition to the Kings Majesty$92403860 997 $aUNISA LEADER 04807nam 22007575 450 001 9910795557803321 005 20210713031136.0 010 $a0-8232-8163-9 010 $a0-8232-7948-0 010 $a0-8232-7949-9 024 7 $a10.1515/9780823279494 035 $a(CKB)4340000000252484 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5247456 035 $a(OCoLC)1002826204 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse66980 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001921811 035 $a(DE-B1597)555075 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780823279494 035 $a(EXLCZ)994340000000252484 100 $a20200723h20182018 fg 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe Self-Emptying Subject $eKenosis and Immanence, Medieval to Modern /$fAlex Dubilet 205 $aFirst edition. 210 1$aNew York, NY :$cFordham University Press,$d[2018] 210 4$d©2018 215 $a1 online resource (248 pages) 225 1 $aThe modern language initiative 300 $aThis edition previously issued in print: 2018. 311 0 $a0-8232-7947-2 311 0 $a0-8232-7946-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tIntroduction --$t1. Meister Eckhart?s Kenotic Lexicon and the Critique of Finitude --$t2. Conceptual Experimentation with the Divine --$t3. From Estrangement to Entäußerung: Undoing the Unhappy Consciousness in the Phenomenology of Spirit --$t4. Hegel?s Annihilation of Finitude --$t5. Sans Emploi, Sans Repos, Sans Réponse: Georges Bataille?s Loss without a Why --$tConclusion --$tAcknowledgments --$tNotes --$tIndex 330 $aAgainst the two dominant ethical paradigms of continental philosophy?Emmanuel Levinas?s ethics of the Other and Michel Foucault?s ethics of self-cultivation?The Self-Emptying Subject theorizes an ethics of self-emptying, or kenosis, that reveals the immanence of an impersonal and dispossessed life ?without a why.? Rather than aligning immanence with the enclosures of the subject, The Self-Emptying Subject engages the history of Christian mystical theology, modern philosophy, and contemporary theories of the subject to rethink immanence as what precedes and exceeds the very difference between the (human) self and the (divine) other, between the subject and transcendence. By arguing that transcendence operates and subjects life in secular no less than in religious domains, this book challenges the dominant distribution of concepts in contemporary theoretical discourse, which insists on associating transcendence exclusively with religion and theology and immanence exclusively with modern secularity and philosophy. The Self-Emptying Subject argues that it is important to resist framing the relationship between medieval theology and modern philosophy as a transition from the affirmation of divine transcendence to the establishment of autonomous subjects. Through an engagement with Meister Eckhart, G.W.F. Hegel, and Georges Bataille, it uncovers a medieval theological discourse that rejects the primacy of pious subjects and the transcendence of God (Eckhart); retrieves a modern philosophical discourse that critiques the creation of self-standing subjects through a speculative re-writing of the concepts of Christian theology (Hegel); and explores a discursive site that demonstrates the subjecting effects of transcendence across theological and philosophical operations and archives (Bataille). Taken together, these interpretations suggest that if we suspend the antagonistic relationship between theological and philosophical discourses, and decenter our periodizing assumptions and practices, we might encounter a yet unmapped theoretical fecundity of self-emptying that frees life from transcendent powers that incessantly subject it for their own ends. 410 0$aModern language initiative. 606 $aIncarnation 606 $aEthics 606 $aOther (Philosophy) 606 $aSelf (Philosophy) 610 $aBataille. 610 $aEthics. 610 $aFrancois Laruelle. 610 $aHegel. 610 $aImmanence. 610 $aKenosis. 610 $aMeister Eckhart. 610 $aMysticism. 610 $aPhilosophy of Religion. 610 $aSubject. 610 $aTranscendence. 615 0$aIncarnation. 615 0$aEthics. 615 0$aOther (Philosophy) 615 0$aSelf (Philosophy) 676 $a141.3 700 $aDubilet$b Alex$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01465210 712 02$aModern Language Initiative. 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910795557803321 996 $aThe Self-Emptying Subject$93675099 997 $aUNINA