LEADER 03173oam 22005052 450 001 9910795308103321 005 20200217170639.0 010 $a90-04-39372-2 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004393721 035 $a(CKB)4970000000170186 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5842387 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004393721 035 $a(PPN)240183428 035 $a(EXLCZ)994970000000170186 100 $a20190329d2019 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aReason and fairness $econstituting justice in Europe, from Medieval Canon Law to ECHR /$fBy Ulrike Mu?ssig 210 1$aLeiden :$cBrill Nijhoff,$d2019. 215 $a1 online resource (676 pages) 225 0 $aLegal history library ;$v27 311 $a90-04-38526-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aFront Matter -- Copyright Page -- Preface -- Foreword -- Foreword -- About the Author -- Abbreviations -- Introduction -- Legal History -- Church -- France -- England -- Germany -- Country Reports: The Contemporary French and British Court System -- Core Patterns of Ordinary Judiciary, Representative throughout the European Union -- Protective Rationale of Ordinary Competence: the Court External Sphere -- Protective Rationale of Objective, General Standards: the Court Internal Sphere -- The Historic Comparison as Line of Arguments for the European Convention -- Legal History ?in Front of Court? -- Legal History as Mentor of Present and Future -- The Idea of Justness behind Ordinary Judicial Competences -- Back Matter -- Bibliography -- Index. 330 $aThroughout Europe, the exercise of justice rests on judicial independence by impartiality. In Reason and Fairness Ulrike Müßig reveals the combination of ordinary judicial competences with procedural rationality, together with the complementarity of procedural and substantive justice, as the foundation for the ?rule of law? in court constitution, far earlier than the advent of liberal constitutionalism. The ECHR fair trial guarantee reads as the historically-grown consensus of the functional judicial independence. Both before historical and contemporary courts, justice is done and seen to be done by means of judgements, whose legal requirements combine the equation of ?fair? and ?legal? with that of ?legal? and ?rational.? This legal determinability of the judge?s fair attitude amounts to the specific (rational) European idea of justice. 410 0$aLegal History Library$v27. 606 $aJustice, Administration of$zEurope$xHistory 606 $aLaw$zEurope$xHistory 606 $aCanon law$zEurope$xHistory 606 $aHuman rights$zEurope$xHistory 615 0$aJustice, Administration of$xHistory. 615 0$aLaw$xHistory. 615 0$aCanon law$xHistory. 615 0$aHuman rights$xHistory. 676 $a346.4 700 $aMu?ssig$b Ulrike$0279213 801 0$bNL-LeKB 801 1$bNL-LeKB 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910795308103321 996 $aReason and fairness$93822416 997 $aUNINA