LEADER 03876nam 2200541 450 001 9910795265903321 005 20220523092014.0 010 $a981-4881-14-7 024 7 $a10.1355/9789814881142 035 $a(CKB)4940000000148589 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9789814881142 035 $a(OCoLC)1136352422 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse82709 035 $a(DE-B1597)544480 035 $a(OCoLC)1129152521 035 $a(DE-B1597)9789814881142 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5984422 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5984422 035 $a(PPN)241543444 035 $a(EXLCZ)994940000000148589 100 $a20220523d2019 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aFree and open Indo-Pacific strategy outlook /$fDavid Arase 210 1$aSingapore :$cISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute,$d[2019] 210 4$dİ2019 215 $a1 online resource (27 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aTrends in Southeast Asia ;$v2019 no. 12 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 27 Jan 2020). 311 0 $a981-4881-13-9 327 $tFront matter --$tFOREWORD --$tFree and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy Outlook --$tFree and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy Outlook --$tFOIP ROLLOUT --$tFOIP IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE --$tTHE UNITED STATES ENDS CHINA ENGAGEMENT AND BEGINS FOIP --$tBASIC ASPECTS OF THE FOIP STRATEGY --$tMUTUAL INTEREST AS THE BASIS FOR PARTNERSHIP --$tTHE ROLE OF REGIONAL ASSOCIATIONS --$tPROSPECTS FOR SUCCESS 330 $aThe United States launched a new Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) strategy in late 2017 after reluctantly concluding that its patient effort to engage and socialize China to the rules-based order since 1972 had failed. China's behaviour since 2009 convinced the United States that China is a revisionist power seeking to impose an authoritarian model of governance in Asia which, if successful, would end the rules-based order in the Indo-Pacific as well as endanger US security and vital trade interests. The new US FOIP strategy initiative seeks to engage like-minded nations in economic, security (both traditional and non-traditional), and political governance partnerships to construct a collaborative and scalable network of relations that will be able to respond flexibly to meet a wide range of stakeholder needs and regional contingencies across the Indo-Pacific region. The United States occupies a peak organizing role in this network and works with a hierarchy of partners distributed throughout the vast Indo-Pacific to meet the economic, security, and governance capacity needs of network members at any level. The rules-based order is the "operating system" of this network approach, and so the network itself sustains the rules-based order for its members as a collective good. FOIP is more like a club that generates rules-based order benefits for its members and as such has little in common with Cold War bloc politics and containment strategy. Bearing in mind that FOIP is only in its start-up phase and is likely to gather momentum going forward; that the elements of this network strategy are already in place; and that the United States and its main FOIP partners together have considerable material, organizational, and soft power resources, one may say that its prospects for long-term sustainability and success are not bad. 410 0$aTrends in Southeast Asia ;$v2019 no. 12. 606 $aInternational relations 615 0$aInternational relations. 676 $a327 700 $aArase$b David$01486927 712 02$aISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910795265903321 996 $aFree and open Indo-Pacific strategy outlook$93729666 997 $aUNINA