LEADER 03344nam 2200637 450 001 9910795030003321 005 20230420133914.0 010 $a1-5036-3124-9 024 7 $a10.1515/9781503631243 035 $a(CKB)4900000000574391 035 $a(DE-B1597)619244 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781503631243 035 $aEBL7012516 035 $a(AU-PeEL)EBL7012516 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7012516 035 $a(OCoLC)1260690041 035 $a(EXLCZ)994900000000574391 100 $a20230420d2022 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aSurviving solitary $eliving and working in restricted housing units /$fDanielle S. Rudes, Shannon Magnuson and Angela Hattery 210 1$aStanford, California :$cStanford University Press,$d[2022] 210 4$dİ2022 215 $a1 online resource (272 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-5036-1467-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tCONTENTS -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tAbbreviations and Glossary -- $t1 Living and Working in the RHU -- $t2 Risk -- $t3 Relationships -- $t4 Rules -- $t5 Reentry -- $t6 Reform -- $t7 Reversal and Revision -- $tBehind the Walls -- $tNotes -- $tReferences -- $tFurther Reading -- $tIndex 330 $aTwenty to forty percent of the US prison population will spend time in restricted housing units?or solitary confinement. These separate units within prisons have enhanced security measures, and thousands of staff control and monitor the residents. Though commonly assumed to be punishment for only the most dangerous behaviors, in reality, these units may also be used in response to minor infractions. In Surviving Solitary, Danielle S. Rudes offers an unprecedented look inside RHUs?and a resounding call to more vigorously confront the intentions and realities of these structures. As the narratives unfold we witness the slow and systematic damage the RHUs inflict upon those living and working inside, through increased risk, arbitrary rules, and strained or absent social interactions. Rudes makes the case that we must prioritize improvement over harm. Residents uniformly call for more humane and dignified treatment. Staff yearn for more expansive control. But, as Rudes shows, there also remains fierce resilience among residents and staff and across the communities they forge?and a perpetual hope that they may have a different future. 606 $aPrisoners$zUnited States 606 $aSolitary confinement 610 $acarceral residents. 610 $acorrectional staff. 610 $ainterviews. 610 $aprison reform. 610 $aprisons. 610 $aqualitative. 610 $areentry. 610 $arestricted housing units. 610 $asolitary confinement. 615 0$aPrisoners 615 0$aSolitary confinement. 676 $a365/.644 700 $aRudes$b Danielle S$g(Danielle Sheldon),$f1971-$01471046 702 $aHattery$b Angela 702 $aMagnuson$b Shannon 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910795030003321 996 $aSurviving solitary$93683164 997 $aUNINA