LEADER 03915nam 2200505I 450 001 9910794805103321 005 20171115094539.0 010 $a1-78743-273-4 010 $a1-78714-843-2 035 $a(CKB)4340000000193355 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4931914 035 $a(UtOrBLW)9781787148437 035 $a(EXLCZ)994340000000193355 100 $a20171115h20172017 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurun||||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 04$aThe Austrian and Bloomington schools of political economy /$fPaul Dragos Aligica (George Mason University), Paul Lewis (King's College), Virgil H. Storr (George Mason Univeristy) 205 $aFirst edition. 210 1$aBingley, England :$cEmerald Publishing,$d2017. 210 4$dİ2017 215 $a1 online resource (196 pages) 225 1 $aAdvances in Austrian economics ;$vv. 22 300 $aIncludes index. 311 $a1-78714-844-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aPrelims -- ABC-Austria, Bloomington, Chicago: political economy the Ostrom Way -- The Ostroms and Hayek as theorists of complex adaptive systems: commonality and complementarity -- A practical approach to understanding: the possibilities and limitations of applied work in political economy -- The organizational evolution of the American National Red Cross: an Austrian and Bloomington approach to organizational growth and expansion -- Covenant and moral psychology in polycentric orders -- The autonomy of the political within political economy -- Innovation as a collective action challenge. 330 $aThe relationship between the Austrian tradition and Bloomington institutionalism has been part of a larger intellectual evolution of a family of schools of thought that coevolved in multiple streams over the last 100 years or so. The Bloomington scholars, once they delineated the broader parameters of their own research program, started to reconstruct, reinterpret, and in many cases simply rediscover and reinvent Austrian insights and themes. As such, they created the possibility of giving those insights and themes new interpretations and new applications, in novel circumstances with new research priorities, in particular, public administration, governance and collective action, and entrepreneurship in non-market settings. Was there a programmatic and explicit effort to recover and reinvent the Austrian tradition? The answer has to be an emphatic 'no'. But that is precisely the reason why the Ostroms' work should be interesting to scholars working in the Austrian tradition. The thematic convergence and the compatibility and complementarity between the Austrian and Bloomington schools is driven by their internal underlying theoretical logic and by the logic of problem solving. Upon closer inspection, the underlying familial and genealogical connections reveal themselves again and again. The convergence and interplay between these two intellectual traditions is rich and productive. On the one hand, it stands as a demonstration of the applied relevance of the set of approaches and issues that we traditionally associate with the Austrian tradition. On the other hand, it is a challenge to further explore and elaborate this area. This volume is an attempt to respond to that challenge. 410 0$aAdvances in Austrian economics ;$vvol. 22. 606 $aEconomics$zAustria 606 $aEconomics$xSociological aspects 615 0$aEconomics 615 0$aEconomics$xSociological aspects. 676 $a330.157 702 $aAligica?$b Paul Dragos? 702 $aLewis$b Paul$f1971- 702 $aStorr$b Virgil Henry$f1975- 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910794805103321 996 $aThe Austrian and Bloomington schools of political economy$93767630 997 $aUNINA