LEADER 03996nam 2200493I 450 001 9910794785203321 005 20170815111805.0 010 $a1-78714-965-X 010 $a1-78714-533-6 035 $a(CKB)4210000000001312 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4830667 035 $a(UtOrBLW)9781787145337 035 $a(EXLCZ)994210000000001312 100 $a20170815d2017 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurun||||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 00$aParables, myths and risks /$fedited by Cheryl R. Lehman 205 $aFirst edition. 210 1$aBingley :$cEmerald Publishing,$d2017. 215 $a1 online resource (232 pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aAdvances in public interest accounting,$x1041-7060 ;$vv. 20 300 $aIncludes index. 311 $a1-78714-534-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aPrelims -- Internal control material weakness and real earnings management -- Can gown help town? exploring the gap between accounting practice and academia and providing a theory for why it exists -- An examination of the perceptions of auditors and chief financial officers of the proposed auditing standard involving other information in audit reports -- The myth of tax evasion in South Asia: the case of a lower-middle income economy -- Institutional pillars and contextualizing public interest in the accounting profession -- "How safe is safe enough?" using Beck's risk society constructs to facilitate changes to unsustainable notions of accountability -- List of reviewers. 330 $aContinuing the search for greater reflectivity regarding accounting's role in society, this volume identifies the many ways accounting contributes to knowledge creation and the consequences in socio-economic realms. Accounting practice has always been concerned with fraud, legitimacy and trust. One might speculate an essential premise behind the audit of publicly held corporations is potential management deception, and thus a raison d'e?tre for accounting and accountability. In this volume researchers, exploring themes of deception: examine financial statement manipulation in the decade after Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX), consider internal control impacts on earnings management, deliberate on the usefulness of audit opinions, and contemplate tax evasion practices and their antecedents. In contextualizing the public interest these researchers contemplate cultural distinctions, conflicts of interest, regulation, and the dynamic interfaces and divides between practitioners and academics. Envisioning the facilitation of overall enhancement of the broad community, recommendations for increasing the quality of communication between scholars and professionals is deliberated. Contributing as well to the undeniable concern for broad environmental degradation, the role of the discipline in maintaining the status quo is challenged. Rather, accounting's characterization of accountability should include attributes of socio-environmental destruction: complexity, uncertainty and diffused responsibility. These emergent accounts would inform the journey of constructing more representative accounts of technological degradation. Such imaginative emancipatory accounting would enhance decision- making, develop social well-being, and unfold new forms of knowledge and possibilities. 410 0$aAdvances in public interest accounting ;$vv. 20. 606 $aFinance, Public$xAccounting 606 $aBusiness & Economics$xAccounting$xFinancial$2bisacsh 606 $aPublic finance accounting$2bicssc 615 0$aFinance, Public$xAccounting. 615 7$aBusiness & Economics$xAccounting$xFinancial. 615 7$aPublic finance accounting. 676 $a657 702 $aLehman$b Cheryl R. 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910794785203321 996 $aParables, myths and risks$93768722 997 $aUNINA