LEADER 01528nam  2200409   450 
001 9910794645103321
005 20220529113608.0
010   $a1-78969-110-9
035   $a(CKB)4100000012027199
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6728772
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL6728772
035   $a(OCoLC)1273977710
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000012027199
100   $a20220529d2019      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aEgil's saga $etraditional evidence for Bru?nanburh compared to literary, historic and archaeological analyses /$fJohn R. Kirby
210  1$aOxford, England :$cArchaeopress,$d[2019]
210  4$d©2019
215   $a1 online resource (62 pages)
330   $aWas Egil's Saga 'written' by Snorri Sturluson or by more than one person? Was it embellished by Snorri or others? Where did the Brúnanburh traditions come from? Is it accurate enough to be used as a historic source - a factual reference? This study aims to identify the incongruities within this saga demonstrating a correct analysis.
606   $aBrunanburh, Battle of, 937$vSources
606   $aArchaeology
615  0$aBrunanburh, Battle of, 937
615  0$aArchaeology.
676   $a839.63
700   $aKirby$b John R$c(Archaeologist),$01492793
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910794645103321
996   $aEgil's saga$93715478
997   $aUNINA