LEADER 03265nam  2200577   450 
001 9910792905603321
005 20230809224743.0
010   $a3-11-052465-1
010   $a3-11-052545-3
024 7 $a10.1515/9783110525458
035   $a(CKB)3710000001410410
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4880129
035   $a(DE-B1597)474451
035   $a(OCoLC)992471877
035   $a(DE-B1597)9783110525458
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4880129
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11399421
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL1015524
035   $a(OCoLC)990930294
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000001410410
100   $a20170717h20172017  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $2rdacontent
182   $2rdamedia
183   $2rdacarrier
200 10$aRefurbishing epistemology $ea meta-epistemological framework /$fDominique Kuenzle
210  1$aBerlin, [Germany] ;$aBoston, [Massachusetts] :$cDe Gruyter,$d2017.
210  4$d©2017
215   $a1 online resource (264 pages)
225 0 $aEpistemic Studies ;$vVolume 35
311   $a3-11-051941-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tFrontmatter -- $tAcknowledgements -- $tContents -- $tIntroduction: Retooling the Epistemic Workshop -- $t1. Towards a New Meta-Epistemology -- $t2. What Is ?Meta-Epistemology?? -- $t3. Epistemic States and Performances -- $t4. Varieties of Norm-Talk -- $t5. Epistemic Evaluations and Concepts -- $tConclusion -- $tBibliography -- $tAuthor Index -- $tSubject Index 
330   $aEven though important developments within 20th and 21st century philosophy have widened the scope of epistemology, this has not yet resulted in a systematic meta-epistemological debate about epistemology?s aims, methods, and criteria of success. Ideas such as the methodology of reflective equilibrium, the proposal to "naturalize" epistemology, constructivist impulses fuelling the "sociology of scientific knowledge", pragmatist calls for taking into account the practical point of epistemic evaluations, as well as feminist criticism of the abstract and individualist assumptions built into traditional epistemology are widely discussed, but they have not typically resulted in the call for, let alone the construction of, a suitable meta-epistemological framework.This book motivates and elaborates such a new meta-epistemology. It provides a pragmatist, social and functionalist account of epistemic states that offers the conceptual space for revised or even replaced epistemic concepts. This is what it means to "refurbish epistemology": The book assesses conceptual tools in relation to epistemology?s functionally defined conceptual space, responsive to both intra-epistemic considerations and political and moral values. 
606   $aKnowledge, Theory of
610   $aSocial epistemology.
610   $aThomas S. Kuhn.
610   $afeminist epistemology.
610   $afunctionalism.
610   $anormativity.
615  0$aKnowledge, Theory of.
676   $a121
700   $aKuenzle$b Dominique$f1973-$01467467
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910792905603321
996   $aRefurbishing epistemology$93719034
997   $aUNINA