LEADER 01819nam 22004093u 450 001 9910457924303321 005 20210107034916.0 010 $a1-280-94846-9 010 $a0-335-22833-X 035 $a(CKB)1000000000361459 035 $a(EBL)295523 035 $a(OCoLC)568049499 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC295523 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000361459 100 $a20130923d2005|||| u|| | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 200 10$aManaging Institutional Self Study$b[electronic resource] 210 $aMaidenhead $cMcGraw-Hill Education$d2005 215 $a1 online resource (210 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-335-21502-5 327 $aCover; Halftitle; Current and forthcoming titles; Title; Copyright; Contents; Dedication; List of figures and tables; Foreword; Series editors' introduction; Acknowledgements; List of abbreviations; Part 1; Chapter 1; Chapter 2; Chapter 3; Part 2; Chapter 4; Chapter 5; Chapter 6; Part 3; Chapter 7; Chapter 8; Chapter 9; References; Appendix 1; Appendix 2; Index 330 $aTalks about the use of evidence in the leadership and management of universities and colleges. This book examines the role of institutional self-study in establishing strategy and measuring progress. It shows how disciplined self-study can assist decision-making, general effectiveness and reputational positioning for universities and colleges. 606 $aStudy skills 608 $aElectronic books. 615 4$aStudy skills. 676 $a371.3 676 $a378.170281 700 $aWatson$b David$0879396 801 0$bAU-PeEL 801 1$bAU-PeEL 801 2$bAU-PeEL 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910457924303321 996 $aManaging Institutional Self Study$92007549 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03736nam 2200481 450 001 9910792897503321 005 20231214203008.0 010 $a90-04-33985-X 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004339859 035 $a(CKB)3710000001084423 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4825540 035 $a(OCoLC)976395900$z(OCoLC)978539346$z(OCoLC)978850791$z(OCoLC)979036926$z(OCoLC)979410452$z(OCoLC)979922049$z(OCoLC)980132944$z(OCoLC)980403971$z(OCoLC)980636942$z(OCoLC)985932419 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004339859 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001084423 100 $a20170405h20172017 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe philosophical Baroque $eon autopoietic modernities /$fby Erik S. Roraback 210 1$aLeiden, The Netherlands ;$aBoston, [Massachusetts] :$cBrill Rodopi,$d2017. 210 4$d©2017 215 $a1 online resource (311 pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aLiterary Modernism,$x2405-9315 ;$vVolume 2 311 $a90-04-32327-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aPreliminary Material -- Introduction: Re-Framing Modernity -- Luhmann and Autopoietic Forms of the (Neo) Baroque Modern: Or, Structure, System, and Contingency -- Folds of Desire?s (Dis)contents: Orson Welles, Lacan, and Shakespeare?s King Lear (c. 1606) -- The Monad of Deleuze?s Many-Tiered High Baroque Leibniz -- Folds of an Autopoietic and Unconscious Monad: Henry James, Benjamin, and Blanchot -- (Neo) Baroque Intersections: Finnegans Wake (1939), Gravity?s Rainbow (1973), and L?Écriture du désastre (The Writing of the Disaster) (1980) -- Neobaroque Fingerprints: Artistic Authority, Interpretation, and Economic Power/Un-power of Finnegans Wake -- Deleuze?s Le pli: Leibniz et le baroque (The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque) (1988) with Joyce?s ?stohong baroque? Finnegans Wake -- Autopoietic Baroque Energies: Finnegans Wake -- Folding Blanchot onto Pynchon: Enlightenment Reason, the Global Technical System, and World Citizenship -- Catastrophe, Allegory, and the Philosophical Baroque: A Quartet of Benjamin-Lacan and Joyce-Pynchon -- Conclusions -- Select Bibliography -- Index of Premodern and Modern Authors -- Index of Sources -- Index of Names and Subjects. 330 $aIn his pioneering study The Philosophical Baroque: On Autopoietic Modernities , Erik S. Roraback argues that modern culture, contemplated over its four-century history, resembles nothing so much as the pearl famously described, by periodizers of old, as irregular, barroco . Reframing modernity as a multi-century baroque, Roraback steeps texts by Shakespeare, Henry James, Joyce, and Pynchon in systems theory and the ideas of philosophers of language and culture from Leibniz to such dynamic contemporaries as Luhmann, Benjamin, Blanchot, Deleuze and Guattari, Lacan, and ?i?ek. The resulting brew, high in intellectual caffeine, will be of value to all who take an interest in cultural modernity?indeed, all who recognize that ?modernity? was (and remains) a congeries of competing aesthetic, economic, historical, ideological, philosophical, and political energies 410 0$aLiterary modernism (Leiden) ;$vVolume 2. 606 $aLiterature, Modern 606 $aLiterature, Modern$xHistory and criticism 615 0$aLiterature, Modern. 615 0$aLiterature, Modern$xHistory and criticism. 676 $a808.8032 700 $aRoraback$b Erik S.$01530258 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910792897503321 996 $aThe philosophical Baroque$93775215 997 $aUNINA