LEADER 03892nam  2200613   450 
001 9910792675203321
005 20230810001608.0
010   $a3-11-048882-5
024 7 $a10.1515/9783110497151
035   $a(CKB)3710000000984001
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4804407
035   $a(DE-B1597)469932
035   $a(OCoLC)979847568
035   $a(DE-B1597)9783110497151
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4804407
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11344941
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL984145
035   $a(OCoLC)973836459
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000984001
100   $a20170227h20172017  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $2rdacontent
182   $2rdamedia
183   $2rdacarrier
200 00$aDiscourse particles $eformal approaches to their syntax and semantics /$fedited by Josef Bayer and Volker Struckmeier
210  1$aBerlin, [Germany] ;$aBoston, [Massachusetts] :$cDe Gruyter,$d2017.
210  4$d©2017
215   $a1 online resource (340 pages) $cillustrations
225 0 $aLinguistische Arbeiten,$x0344-6727 ;$vVolume 564
311   $a3-11-049348-9 
311   $a3-11-049715-8 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tThe status quo of research on discourse particles in syntax and semantics -- $tThe syntax and semantics of discourse particles -- $tWhat you see is what you get: Chinese sentence-final particles as head-final complementizers -- $tThe syntax of Swedish modal particles -- $tDiscourse particles and hvađ-exclamatives -- $tRoot infinitivals and modal particles. An interim report -- $tModal particles ? modal particles (= modal particles) -- $tDiscourse particles ?embedded?: German ja in adjectival phrases -- $tCombining ja and doch: A case of discourse structural iconicity -- $tDiscourse marker = discourse particle = thetical = modal particle? A futile comparison -- $tStressed and unstressed particles in Old Indic -- $tOn the status and the interpretation of the left-peripheral sentence particles inu and ia in Old High German -- $tIndex 
330   $aParticles have for the longest time been ignored by linguistic research. School-type grammars ignored them since they did not fit into pre-conceived notions of categories, and since they did not seem to enter into grammatical relations commonly discussed in the genre. Only in the last century did some publications discuss particles ? and even then only from the perspective of their discourse and pragmatic functions, i.e. their dependance on certain previous contexts, and concluded that the function of particles for the grammar of sentences and their interpretation remains obscure. The current volume presents 11 new articles that take a fresh look at particles: As it turns out, particles inform many aspects of syntax and semantics, too ? both diachronically and synchronically: Particles are shown to have fascinating syntactic properties with respect to projection, locality, movement and scope. Their interpretative contributions can be studied with the rigorous methods of formal semantics. Cross-linguistic and diachronic investigations shed new light on the genesis and development of these intriguing ? and under-estimated ? kinds of lexical elements.
606   $aLinguistics$xParticles
606   $aLinguistics$xDiscourse analysis
606   $aDiscourse markers
610   $aFormal Semantics.
610   $aLanguage History.
610   $aSyntax.
615  0$aLinguistics$xParticles.
615  0$aLinguistics$xDiscourse analysis.
615  0$aDiscourse markers.
676   $a410.5
702   $aBayer$b Josef
702   $aStruckmeier$b Volker
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910792675203321
996   $aDiscourse particles$91294028
997   $aUNINA