LEADER 01831cam0-2200577---450- 001 990000057430203316 005 20091105153427.0 010 $a0-19-826270-1 035 $a0005743 035 $aUSA010005743 035 $a(ALEPH)000005743USA01 035 $a0005743 100 $a20000914d1999----|||y0itay0103----ba 101 0 $aeng 102 $aGB 105 $a||||||||00yyy 200 1 $aAutonomy in international contracts$fPeter Nygh 210 $aOxford$cClarendon Press$dcopyr. 1999 215 $aXXXV, 282 p.$d24 cm 225 $aOxford Monographs in private international law 410 0$a12001$aOxford Monographs in private international law 610 $aConflitti di legge 610 $aContratti 676 $a340. 92$v11 rid. it. 700 1$aNYGH,$bPeter$0746651 701 1$aCLARIZIA$b, Laura$0543090 701 1$aSEDAN,$bGerardo$0543924 801 $aIT$bSALBC$gISBD 912 $a990000057430203316 951 $aXXIII.3.E. 94 (IG VIII 24 591)$b23770 G.$cXXIII.3.E. 94 (IG VIII 24)$d00173142 959 $aBK 979 $c20000914$lUSA01$h1726 979 $c20000919$lUSA01$h1047 979 $c20000919$lUSA01$h1520 979 $c20001019$lUSA01$h1055 979 $c20001019$lUSA01$h1452 979 $c20001019$lUSA01$h1500 979 $c20001019$lUSA01$h1537 979 $c20001024$lUSA01$h1513 979 $c20001027$lUSA01$h1518 979 $c20001027$lUSA01$h1522 979 $c20001110$lUSA01$h1709 979 $c20001124$lUSA01$h1207 979 $c20020403$lUSA01$h1613 979 $aPATRY$b90$c20040406$lUSA01$h1605 979 $aRSIAV5$b90$c20091105$lUSA01$h1534 979 $aPATRY$b90$c20130318$lUSA01$h1240 979 $aPATRY$b90$c20130318$lUSA01$h1241 996 $aAutonomy in international contracts$91490619 997 $aUNISA bas $agiu LEADER 04124nam 2200721Ia 450 001 9910792595803321 005 20230515114408.0 010 $a1-282-71634-4 010 $a9786612716348 010 $a3-11-022024-5 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110220247 035 $a(CKB)2670000000018726 035 $a(EBL)516560 035 $a(OCoLC)630538962 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000429856 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11301589 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000429856 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10431462 035 $a(PQKB)11111289 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC516560 035 $a(DE-B1597)36873 035 $a(OCoLC)881292759 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110220247 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL516560 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10381205 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL271634 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000018726 100 $a20100125d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||#|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aTopicalization and stress clash avoidance in the history of English$b[electronic resource] /$fby Augustin Speyer 210 $aDe Gruyter Mouton $cBerlin ; New York$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (296 p.) 225 1 $aTopics in English linguistics ;$v69 300 $aOriginally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universita?t Frankfurt, Germany-2008. 311 $a3-11-022023-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter --$tContents --$t1. Introduction --$t2. Topicalization in Middle and Modern English - A prosodically induced change in syntactic usage --$t3. The Clash Avoidance Requirement in Modern English and German --$t4. Phonological Aspects of the Clash Avoidance Requirement --$t5. Topicalization and the Clash Avoidance Requirement in Old English --$t6. Concluding remarks --$tBackmatter 330 $aThe book is concerned with the interaction of syntax, information structure and prosody in the history of English, demonstrating this with a case study of object topicalization. The approach is data-oriented, using material from syntactically parsed digital corpora of Old, Middle and Early Modern English, which serve as a solid foundation for conclusions. The use of object topicalization underwent a sharp decline from Old English until today. In the present volume, a basic prosodic well-formedness condition, the Clash Avoidance Requirement, is identified as the main factor for this change. With the loss of V2-syntax, object topicalization led more easily to cases in which two focalized phrases, the topicalized object and the subject, are adjacent. The two focal accents on these phrases would produce a clash, thus violating the Clash Avoidance Requirement. In order to circumvent this, the use of topicalization in critical cases is avoided. The Clash Avoidance Requirement is highly relevant also today, as experimental data on English and German show. Further, the Clash Avoidance Requirement helps to explain the well-known syntactic structure of the left periphery in Old English. An analysis positing two subject positions is defended in the study. The variation of these subject positions is shown to depend not on pronominal vs. lexical status of the subject but on information structural properties. 410 0$aTopics in English linguistics ;$v69. 606 $aEnglish language$xGrammar, Historical 606 $aEnglish language$xSyntax 606 $aEnglish language$xWord order 606 $aEnglish language$xHistory 610 $aEnglish /Language. 610 $aLanguage Change. 610 $aProsody. 615 0$aEnglish language$xGrammar, Historical. 615 0$aEnglish language$xSyntax. 615 0$aEnglish language$xWord order. 615 0$aEnglish language$xHistory. 676 $a420/.9 700 $aSpeyer$b Augustin$0512980 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910792595803321 996 $aTopicalization and stress clash avoidance in the history of English$93726770 997 $aUNINA