LEADER 03483nam  22006852  450 
001 9910792355503321
005 20160224031217.0
010   $a1-107-20557-3
010   $a1-282-53602-8
010   $a9786612536021
010   $a0-511-67828-2
010   $a0-511-67702-2
010   $a0-511-68151-8
010   $a0-511-68349-9
010   $a0-511-67618-2
010   $a0-511-67953-X
035   $a(CKB)2670000000014307
035   $a(EBL)502510
035   $a(OCoLC)667095944
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000361769
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11249098
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000361769
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10362059
035   $a(PQKB)11150351
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511676185
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC502510
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL502510
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10382902
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL253602
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000014307
100   $a20100212d2010||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aInternational security in practice $ethe politics of NATO-Russia diplomacy /$fVincent Pouliot$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2010.
215   $a1 online resource (xv, 282 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
225 1 $aCambridge studies in international relations ;$v113
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 24 Feb 2016).
311   $a0-521-12203-1 
311   $a0-521-19916-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tIntroduction --$tThe logic of practicality : a theory of practice of security communities --$tA "sobjective" methodology for the study of practicality --$tThe logic of practicality at the NATO-Russia council --$tThe early steps : NATO, Russia and the double enlargement, 1992-1997 --$tThe fallout : NATO and Russia from Kosovo to Georgia, 1998-2008 --$tConclusion.
330   $aHow do once bitter enemies move beyond entrenched rivalry at the diplomatic level? In one of the first attempts to apply practice theory to the study of International Relations, Vincent Pouliot builds on Pierre Bourdieu's sociology to devise a theory of practice of security communities and applies it to post-Cold War security relations between NATO and Russia. Based on dozens of interviews and a thorough analysis of recent history, Pouliot demonstrates that diplomacy has become a normal, though not a self-evident, practice between the two former enemies. He argues that this limited pacification is due to the intense symbolic power struggles that have plagued the relationship ever since NATO began its process of enlargement at the geographical and functional levels. So long as Russia and NATO do not cast each other in the roles that they actually play together, security community development is bound to remain limited.
410  0$aCambridge studies in international relations ;$v113.
606   $aSecurity, International
607   $aRussia (Federation)$xForeign relations
615  0$aSecurity, International.
676   $a327.4701821
686   $a89.70$2bcl
700   $aPouliot$b Vincent$f1979-$0720067
712 02$aNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization,
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910792355503321
996   $aInternational security in practice$93766056
997   $aUNINA