LEADER 03940nam 2200565 a 450 001 9910791761103321 005 20230725021027.0 010 $a0-309-16231-9 010 $a1-282-88576-6 010 $a9786612885761 010 $a0-309-16016-2 035 $a(CKB)2560000000068391 035 $a(EBL)3378682 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000442742 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11312034 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000442742 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10446874 035 $a(PQKB)11369136 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3378682 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3378682 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10425173 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL288576 035 $a(OCoLC)817955755 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000068391 100 $a20101202d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aStandards for K-12 engineering education?$b[electronic resource] /$fCommittee on Standards for K-12 Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academies Press$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (161 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-309-16015-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $a""Front Matter""; ""Preface""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""Contents""; ""Executive Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 Arguments For and Against Content Standards for K-12 Engineering Education""; ""3 Leveraging Existing Standards to Improve K-12 Engineering Education""; ""4 Conclusions and Recommendations""; ""Appendix A: Committee Biographies""; ""Appendix B: Commissioned Papers""; ""Appendix C: Workshop on Standards for K-12 Engineering Education"" 330 $a"The goal of this study was to assess the value and feasibility of developing and implementing content standards for engineering education at the K-12 level. Content standards have been developed for three disciplines in STEM education--science, technology, and mathematic--but not for engineering. To date, a small but growing number of K-12 students are being exposed to engineering-related materials, and limited but intriguing evidence suggests that engineering education can stimulate interest and improve learning in mathematics and science as well as improve understanding of engineering and technology. Given this background, a reasonable question is whether standards would improve the quality and increase the amount of teaching and learning of engineering in K-12 education. The book concludes that, although it is theoretically possible to develop standards for K-12 engineering education, it would be extremely difficult to ensure their usefulness and effective implementation. This conclusion is supported by the following findings: (1) there is relatively limited experience with K-12 engineering education in U.S. elementary and secondary schools, (2) there is not at present a critical mass of teachers qualified to deliver engineering instruction, (3) evidence regarding the impact of standards-based educational reforms on student learning in other subjects, such as mathematics and science, is inconclusive, and (4) there are significant barriers to introducing stand-alone standards for an entirely new content area in a curriculum already burdened with learning goals in more established domains of study."--Publisher's description. 606 $aEngineering$xStudy and teaching (Elementary)$zUnited States 606 $aEngineering$xStudy and teaching (Secondary)$zUnited States 615 0$aEngineering$xStudy and teaching (Elementary) 615 0$aEngineering$xStudy and teaching (Secondary) 676 $a372.358 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910791761103321 996 $aStandards for K-12 engineering education$93833830 997 $aUNINA