LEADER 03733oam 2200709Ka 450 001 9910791648303321 005 20190503073412.0 010 $a0-262-28909-1 010 $a1-282-89918-X 010 $a9786612899188 010 $a0-262-28920-2 035 $a(CKB)2560000000054388 035 $a(OCoLC)829713414 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10424677 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000438842 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12127640 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000438842 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10458806 035 $a(PQKB)10845995 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3339162 035 $a(OCoLC)829713414$z(OCoLC)682095455$z(OCoLC)816618630$z(OCoLC)939263798$z(OCoLC)961532383$z(OCoLC)962575705 035 $a(OCoLC-P)829713414 035 $a(MaCbMITP)8860 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3339162 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10424677 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL289918 035 $a(OCoLC)939263798 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000054388 100 $a20130311d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aLaws, outlaws, and terrorists $elessons from the War on Terrorism /$fGabriella Blum and Philip B. Heymann 210 $aCambridge, Mass. $cMIT Press$dİ2010 215 $a1 online resource (254 p.) 225 1 $aBelfer Center studies in international security 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-262-51860-0 311 $a0-262-01475-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $a"In an age of global terrorism, can the pursuit of security be reconciled with liberal democratic values and legal principles? During its "global war on terrorism," the Bush administration argued that the United States was in a new kind of conflict, one in which peacetime domestic law was irrelevant and international law inapplicable. From 2001 to 2009, the United States thus waged war on terrorism in a "no-law zone." 330 $aGabriella Blum and Philip Heymann reject the argument that traditional American values embodied in domestic and international law can be ignored in any sustainable effort to keep the United States safe from terrorism. In Laws, Outlaws, and Terrorists, they demonstrate that the costs are great and the benefits slight from separating security and the rule of law. 330 $aBlum and Heymann argue that the harsh measures employed by the Bush administration were authorized too broadly, resulted in too much harm, and often proved to be counterproductive for security. Blum and Heymann recognize that a severe terrorist attack might justify changing the balance between law and security, but they call for reasoned judgment instead of a wholesale abandonment of American values. They also argue that being open to negotiations and seeking to win the moral support of the communities from which the terrorists emerge are noncoercive strategies that must be included in any future efforts to reduce terrorism."--Pub. desc. 410 0$aBelfer Center studies in international security. 606 $aWar on Terrorism, 2001-2009 606 $aTerrorism$zUnited States$xPrevention 606 $aTerrorism$xGovernment policy$zUnited States 610 $aSOCIAL SCIENCES/Political Science/General 615 0$aWar on Terrorism, 2001-2009. 615 0$aTerrorism$xPrevention. 615 0$aTerrorism$xGovernment policy 676 $a363.325/15610973 700 $aBlum$b Gabriella$01513512 701 $aHeymann$b Philip B$0562961 801 0$bOCoLC-P 801 1$bOCoLC-P 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910791648303321 996 $aLaws, outlaws, and terrorists$93748056 997 $aUNINA