LEADER 03330nam  22005173u 450 
001 9910791429603321
005 20230725015657.0
010   $a0-231-50887-5
035   $a(CKB)2560000000050751
035   $a(EBL)895087
035   $a(OCoLC)664802793
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC895087
035   $a(EXLCZ)992560000000050751
100   $a20130418d2010||||  u||            |
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
200 10$aNaturalism and Normativity$b[electronic resource]
210   $aNew York $cColumbia University Press$d2010
215   $a1 online resource (378 p.)
225 1 $aColumbia Themes in Philosophy
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-231-13467-3 
327   $aContents; Introduction: Science, Naturalism, and the Problem of Normativity; Part I: Conceptual and Historical Background; 1: The Wider Significance of Naturalism a Genealogical Essay (Akeel Bilgrami); 2: Naturalism and Quietism (Richard Rorty); 3: Is Liberal Naturalism Possible?(Mario De Caro and Alberto Voltolini); Part II: Philosophy and the Natural Sciences; 4: Science and Philosophy (Hilary Putnam); 5: Why Scientific Realism May Invite Relativism (Carol Rovane); Part III: Philosophy and the Human Sciences; 6: Taking the Human Sciences Seriously (David Macarthur)
327   $a7: Reasons and Causes Revisited (Peter Menzies)Part IV: Meta-Ethics and Normativity; 8: Metaphysics and Morals (T. M . Scanlon); 9: The Naturalist Gap in Ethics (Erin I. Kelly and Lionel K. McPherson); 10: Phenomenology and the Normativity of Practical Reason (Stephen L. White); Part V: Epistemology and Normativity; 11: Truth as Convenient Friction (Huw Price); 12: Exchange on "Truth as Convenient Friction" (Richard Rorty and Huw Price); 13: Two Directions for Analytic Kantianism Naturalism and Idealism (Paul Redding); Part VI: Naturalism and Human Nature
327   $a14: How to be Naturalistic Without Being Simplistic in the Study of Human Nature (John Dupre?)15: Dewey, Continuity, and McDowell (Peter Godfrey-Smith); 16: Wittgenstein and Naturalism (Marie McGinn); Contributors; Index
330   $aNormativity concerns what we ought to think or do and the evaluations we make. For example, we say that we ought to think consistently, we ought to keep our promises, or that Mozart is a better composer than Salieri. Yet what philosophical moral can we draw from the apparent absence of normativity in the scientific image of the world? For scientific naturalists, the moral is that the normative must be reduced to the nonnormative, while for nonnaturalists, the moral is that there must be a transcendent realm of norms. Naturalism and Normativity engages with both sides of t
410  0$aColumbia Themes in Philosophy
606   $aNaturalism
606   $aNaturalism
606   $aNormativity (Ethics)
606   $aNormativity (Ethics)
615  4$aNaturalism.
615  4$aNaturalism.
615  4$aNormativity (Ethics).
615  4$aNormativity (Ethics).
676   $a146
676   $a501
700   $aDe Caro$b Mario$0290682
701   $aMacarthur$b David$01511459
801  0$bAU-PeEL
801  1$bAU-PeEL
801  2$bAU-PeEL
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910791429603321
996   $aNaturalism and Normativity$93744772
997   $aUNINA