LEADER 04260nam 2200745Ia 450 001 9910791427603321 005 20230912134510.0 010 $a1-282-74071-7 010 $a9786612740718 010 $a0-7748-5160-0 024 7 $a10.59962/9780774851602 035 $a(CKB)2560000000050559 035 $a(OCoLC)180704421 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10139137 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000382688 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11268097 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000382688 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10396483 035 $a(PQKB)10536158 035 $a(CaPaEBR)404270 035 $a(CaBNvSL)jme00326746 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3412340 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10146905 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL274071 035 $a(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/4bxb8c 035 $a(schport)gibson_crkn/2009-12-01/2/404270 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3412340 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3246071 035 $a(DE-B1597)661253 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780774851602 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000050559 100 $a20050902h20062006 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe last word $emedia coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada /$fFlorian Sauvageau, David Schneiderman, David Taras ; with Ruth Klinkhammer and Pierre Trudel 210 1$aVancouver :$cUBC Press,$d2006. 210 4$aŠ2006 215 $a1 online resource (vii, 260 pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aLaw and society series 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 0 $a0-7748-1244-3 311 0 $a0-7748-1243-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront Matter -- $tContents -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tJudgment Day: A Vignette -- $tIntroduction: The Supreme Court under the Media Lens -- $tA Year in the Life of the Supreme Court -- $tEqual in Alberta: The Vriend Case -- $tCourt and Spin Country: The Quebec Secession Reference -- $t"Sea of Confusion": R. v. Marshall -- $t"Parents Can Sleep Soundly": The Queen v. John Robin Sharpe -- $tJudges and Journalists -- $tConclusion: Reporting the Supreme Court through a Political Prism -- $tAppendix A: Interview Questions -- $tAppendix B: Method of Analysis Coding Instructions and Sample Code Sheet -- $tAbout the Authors -- $tIndex -- $tLaw and Society 330 $aMedia coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada has emerged as a crucial factor not only for judges and journalists but also for the public. It's the media, after all, that decide which court rulings to cover and how. They translate highly complex judgments into concise and meaningful news stories that will appeal to, and be understood by, the general public. Thus, judges lose control of the message once they hand down decisions, and journalists have the last word. To show how the Supreme Court has fared under the media spotlight, Sauvageau, Schneiderman, and Taras examine a year in the life of the court and then focus on the media coverage of four high-profile decisions: the Marshall case, about Aboriginal rights; the Vriend case, about gay rights; the Quebec Secession Reference; and the Sharpe child pornography case. They explore the differences between television and newspaper coverage, national and regional reporting, and the French- and English-language media. They also describe how judges and journalists understand and interact with one another amid often-clashing legal and journalistic cultures, offering a rich and detailed account of the relationship between two of the most important institutions in Canadian life. 410 0$aLaw and society series (Vancouver, B.C.) 606 $aJudgments$xPress coverage$zCanada 606 $aPress and politics$zCanada 615 0$aJudgments$xPress coverage 615 0$aPress and politics 676 $a070.4/4934771035 676 $a347.71/035 700 $aSauvageau$b Florian$f1941-$01578374 701 $aSchneiderman$b David$f1958-$01578375 701 $aTaras$b David$f1950-$0801721 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910791427603321 996 $aThe last word$93857692 997 $aUNINA