LEADER 03358oam 2200589Ia 450 001 9910791355003321 005 20190503073353.0 010 $a0-262-29153-3 010 $a1-282-63829-7 010 $a9786612638299 010 $a0-262-26609-1 035 $a(CKB)2560000000014308 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000429308 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11249699 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000429308 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10430281 035 $a(PQKB)10913528 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3339124 035 $a(OCoLC)646068759$z(OCoLC)608376559$z(OCoLC)620103778$z(OCoLC)647923447$z(OCoLC)743201095$z(OCoLC)747305675$z(OCoLC)763093347$z(OCoLC)816563050$z(OCoLC)961604459$z(OCoLC)962611178$z(OCoLC)966248267$z(OCoLC)971458256$z(OCoLC)975598694$z(OCoLC)988459068$z(OCoLC)991995007$z(OCoLC)992003039$z(OCoLC)994497961$z(OCoLC)1011934055$z(OCoLC)1017998398$z(OCoLC)1037943840$z(OCoLC)1038662962$z(OCoLC)1042321820$z(OCoLC)1045535003$z(OCoLC)1066440692$z(OCoLC)1081216783 035 $a(OCoLC-P)646068759 035 $a(MaCbMITP)8694 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3339124 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10384054 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL263829 035 $a(OCoLC)646068759 035 $a(PPN)170260275 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000014308 100 $a20100706d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aTaking economics seriously /$fDean Baker 210 $aCambridge, Mass. $cMIT Press$dİ2010 215 $a87 p 225 1 $aA Boston review book 300 $a"A Boston Review Book." 311 $a0-262-01418-1 327 $aThe myth of the free market -- Malpractice: on health care, economists ignore their own rules -- Title TK -- An economy for everyone. 330 $a'There is nothing wrong with economics, Dean Baker contends, but economists routinely ignore their own principles when it comes to economic policy. What would policy look like if we took basic principles of mainstream economics seriously and applied them consistently? In the debate over regulation, for example, Baker--one of the few economists who predicted the meltdown of fall 2008--points out that ideological blinders have obscured the fact there is no "free market" to protect. Modern markets are highly regulated, although intrusive regulations such as copyright and patents are rarely viewed as regulatory devices. If we admit the extent to which the economy is and will be regulated, we have many more options in designing policy and deciding who benefits from it. On health care reform, Baker complains that economists ignore another basic idea: marginal cost pricing. Unlike all other industries, medical services are priced extraordinarily high, far above the cost of production, yet that discrepancy is rarely addressed in the debate about health care reform. What if we applied marginal cost pricing--making doctors' wages competitive and charging less for prescription drugs and tests such as MRIs? ..."--Product Description. 606 $aEconomics 610 $aECONOMICS/General 615 0$aEconomics. 676 $a330 700 $aBaker$b Dean$f1958-$01484407 801 0$bOCoLC-P 801 1$bOCoLC-P 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910791355003321 996 $aTaking economics seriously$93862642 997 $aUNINA