LEADER 03456oam 2200601Ia 450 001 9910791140103321 005 20231120212401.0 010 $a0-292-79345-6 024 7 $a10.7560/752795 035 $a(CKB)2560000000007576 035 $a(OCoLC)501014427 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10340889 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000340821 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11233241 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000340821 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10387759 035 $a(PQKB)10883776 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3443435 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse2403 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3443435 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10340889 035 $a(DE-B1597)586929 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780292793453 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000007576 100 $a20090330d2009 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe neural imagination $eaesthetic and neuroscientific approaches to the arts /$fIrving Massey 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aAustin :$cUniversity of Texas Press,$d2009. 215 $a1 online resource (xvi, 224 pages, 8 unnumbered pages of plates) $cillustrations (some color), music 225 1 $aCognitive approaches to literature and culture series 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 0 $a0-292-75279-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter --$tContents --$tList of Illustrations --$tPreface --$tAcknowledgments --$tPart 1: The Imagination, Neural --$tChapter 1. Background, Purposes, and Limitations of the Inquiry --$tChapter 2. Neuroscience and the Visual Arts --$tChapter 3. At the Limits of Language --$tChapter 4. Music and Language in Dream --$tPart 2: The Imagination, Plain --$tChapter 5. The Three Fields --$tPart 3: Conclusions --$tChapter 6. Ideas and Values --$tBibliography --$tIndex 330 $aArt and technology have been converging rapidly in the past few years; an important example of this convergence is the alliance of neuroscience with aesthetics, which has produced the new field of neuroaesthetics. Irving Massey examines this alliance, in large part to allay the fears of artists and audiences alike that brain science may "explain away" the arts. The first part of the book shows how neuroscience can enhance our understanding of certain features of art. The second part of the book illustrates a humanistic approach to the arts; it is written entirely without recourse to neuroscience, in order to show the differences in methodology between the two approaches. The humanistic style is marked particularly by immersion in the individual work and by evaluation, rather than by detachment in the search for generalizations. In the final section Massey argues that, despite these differences, once the reality of imagination is accepted neuroscience can be seen as the collaborator, not the inquisitor, of the arts. 410 0$aCognitive approaches to literature and culture series. 517 3 $aAesthetic and neuroscientific approaches to the arts 606 $aNeurosciences and the arts 615 0$aNeurosciences and the arts. 676 $a701/.1 700 $aMassey$b Irving$0458671 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910791140103321 996 $aThe neural imagination$93774734 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02314nam 22004213a 450 001 9910573815203321 005 20220818194930.0 024 7 $a10.38107/027 035 $a(CKB)5710000000006361 035 $a(EXLCZ)995710000000006361 100 $a20220614d2022 |y| | 101 0 $aeng 200 10$aSeeking convergence? $ea comparative analysis of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union on seeking asylum /$fMaja ?ysienia 210 1$aZürich :$csui generis Verlag,$d2022. 215 $aonline resource 330 3 $aSince 2009 two courts have been shaping human rights of asylum seekers in Europe: the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Side by side, the courts examined who is protected from refoulement, when and how asylum seekers can be detained and what remedies they should have access to. Did they seek convergence in their asylum case-law or paid no attention to each other?s jurisprudence? Did they establish a coherent standard of the asylum seekers? protection in Europe? Judicial dialogue between the ECtHR and CJEU in the area of asylum is at the heart of this study. The book offers also a comprehensive overview of the asylum case-law of the two courts and identifies the main convergences and divergences in their approach to protection against refoulement, immigration detention and effective remedies. 517 1 $aSeeking convergence? 606 $aasylum seeker$9eng$2EUROVOC 606 $aCourt of Justice of the European Union$9eng$2EUROVOC 606 $aEuropean Court of Human Rights$9eng$2EUROVOC 606 $acase-law (EU)$9eng$2EUROVOC 606 $acomparative law$9eng$2EUROVOC 606 $aremoval$9eng$2EUROVOC 606 $amigration control$9eng$2EUROVOC 606 $aillegal migration$9eng$2EUROVOC 615 7$aasylum seeker. 615 7$aCourt of Justice of the European Union. 615 7$aEuropean Court of Human Rights. 615 7$acase-law (EU) 615 7$acomparative law. 615 7$aremoval. 615 7$amigration control. 615 7$aillegal migration. 700 $a?ysienia$b Maja$01252609 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910573815203321 996 $aSeeking convergence$92903933 997 $aUNINA