LEADER 02424oam  2200613I  450 
001 9910790948303321
005 20230421051752.0
010   $a1-135-88921-X
010   $a1-138-42399-8
010   $a1-315-06061-2
010   $a1-135-88914-7
024 7 $a10.4324/9781315060613 
035   $a(CKB)2550000001257141
035   $a(EBL)1665791
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001179888
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12501997
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001179888
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11198884
035   $a(PQKB)10442929
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1665791
035   $a(OCoLC)622694077
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001257141
100   $a20180706d1992      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aAssigning liability for Superfund cleanups $ean analysis of policy options /$fKatherine N. Probst, Paul R. Portney
210  1$aNew York :$cResources for the Future,$d1992.
215   $a1 online resource (78 p.)
225 1 $aRFF report
300   $a"June 1992."
311   $a0-915707-64-0 
311   $a1-306-57620-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $a1. Introduction -- 2. Policy options and evaluative criteria -- 3. Analysis of policy options -- 4. Conclusions.
330   $aWhile more than 2,700 emergency removals of hazardous materials have taken place under Superfund, implementing the long-term cleanup program has been the object of considerable controversy. One of the most contentious issues is whether the liability standards in the law should be revised. The authors analyze the pros and cons associated with the current liability approach, as well as with a variety of alternative strategies.
410  0$aRFF report.
606   $aLiability for hazardous substances pollution damages$zUnited States
606   $aHazardous waste sites$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States
615  0$aLiability for hazardous substances pollution damages
615  0$aHazardous waste sites$xLaw and legislation
676   $a344.73/04622
676   $a347.3044622
700   $aProbst$b Katherine N.$01525440
701   $aPortney$b Paul R$0141150
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910790948303321
996   $aAssigning liability for Superfund cleanups$93766829
997   $aUNINA