LEADER 02088oam  2200517I  450 
001 9910790934503321
005 20230206182951.0
010   $a1-135-89033-1
010   $a1-138-46573-9
010   $a1-315-06065-5
010   $a0-585-33136-7
010   $a1-135-89026-9
024 7 $a10.4324/9781315060651
035   $a(CKB)2550000001257010
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1665792
035   $a(OCoLC)45843765
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001257010
100   $a20180706d1994      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $2rdacontent
182   $2rdamedia
183   $2rdacarrier
200 00$aWorst things first? $ethe debate over risk-based national environmental priorities /$feditors, Adam M. Finkel, Dominic Golding
210  1$aNew York :$cResources for the Future,$d1994.
215   $a1 online resource (xiv, 348 pages) $cillustrations
300   $aPapers presented at a conference held from November 15 to 17, 1992, in Annapolis, Maryland.
311 0 $a0-915707-76-4 
311 0 $a1-306-57489-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $apt. 1. Introduction -- pt. 2. The EPA paradigm -- pt. 3. Three alternative paradigms -- pt. 4. Conclusions.
330   $aFor any government agency, the distribution of available resources among problems or programs is crucially important. This book illustrates the controversy that ensues when previously implicit administrative processes are made explicit and subjected to critical examination. It reveals the limitations to quantitative risk assessment.
606   $aEnvironmental risk assessment$zUnited States$vCongresses
606   $aEnvironmental policy$zUnited States$vCongresses
615  0$aEnvironmental risk assessment
615  0$aEnvironmental policy
676   $a363.700973
701   $aFinkel$b Adam M$0762787
701   $aGolding$b Dominic$01558041
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910790934503321
996   $aWorst things first$93822109
997   $aUNINA