LEADER 02218oam  2200457   450 
001 9910790866203321
005 20190911112724.0
010   $a1-78326-281-8
035   $a(OCoLC)862815227
035   $a(MiFhGG)GVRL8RFB
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001160100
100   $a20140529h20142014  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurun|---uuuua
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aOpen innovation research, management and practice /$feditor, Joe Tidd, SPRU, University of Sussex, UK
210  1$aLondon :$cImperial College Press,$d[2014]
210  4$d?2014
215   $a1 online resource (vii, 447 pages)
225 1 $aSeries on technology management,$x0219-9823 ;$vvolume 23
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-78326-280-X 
311   $a1-306-12054-3 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $apart I. Taxonomies and modes -- part II. Context and contingencies -- part III. Sector and industry studies -- part IV. Limitations and constraints of open innovation.
330   $aThe concept of open innovation has become increasingly popular in the management and policy literature on technology and innovation. However, despite the large volume of empirical work, many of the prescriptions being proposed are fairly general and not specific to particular contexts and contingencies. The proponents of open innovation are universally positive but research suggests that the specific mechanisms and outcomes of open innovation models are very sensitive to context and contingency. This is not surprising because the open or closed nature of innovation is historically contingent a
410  0$aSeries on technology management ;$vv. 23.
606   $aTechnological innovations$xManagement
606   $aResearch, Industrial$xManagement
615  0$aTechnological innovations$xManagement.
615  0$aResearch, Industrial$xManagement.
676   $a658.57
702   $aTidd$b Joseph$f1960-
801  0$bMiFhGG
801  1$bMiFhGG
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910790866203321
996   $aOpen innovation research, management and practice$93872315
997   $aUNINA