LEADER 01416nam--2200421---450- 001 990003441600203316 005 20100915105229.0 010 $a978-1-902040-95-0 035 $a000344160 035 $aUSA01000344160 035 $a(ALEPH)000344160USA01 035 $a000344160 100 $a20100915d2009----km-y0itay50------ba 101 $amul 102 $aGB 105 $a||||||||001yy 200 1 $a<> Survey of Numismatic Research 2002-2007$fGeneral Editor Michel Amandry, Donal Bateson$gSubeditors Philip Attwood ... [et al.] 210 $aGlasgow$cInternational Association of Professional Numismatists$d2009 215 $aXII, 726 p.$d30 cm 225 2 $aSpecial publications 300 $aIn testa al front.: Intrnational Numismatic Commission 300 $aSul front.: 14. International Numismatic Congress, Glasgow 2009 410 0$12001$aSpecial publications 454 1$12001 461 1$1001-------$12001 606 0 $aNumismatica 676 $a737 702 1$aAMANDRY,$bMichel 702 1$aBATESON,$bDonal 712 02$aInternational numismatic commission$d<14. ;$f2009 ;$eGlasgow> 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990003441600203316 951 $aXII.1.D. 17$b228233 L.M.$cXII.1.D.$d00282219 959 $aBK 969 $aUMA 979 $aMARTUCCIEL$b90$c20100915$lUSA01$h1052 996 $aSurvey of numismatic research, 2002-2007$9241225 997 $aUNISA LEADER 04324nam 2200661 450 001 9910790604303321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-674-72754-1 010 $a0-674-72635-9 024 7 $a10.4159/harvard.9780674726352 035 $a(CKB)2550000001140816 035 $a(EBL)3301342 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000940860 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12402430 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000940860 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10956011 035 $a(PQKB)10784163 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3301342 035 $a(DE-B1597)209632 035 $a(OCoLC)861200160 035 $a(OCoLC)979684090 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780674726352 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3301342 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10782447 035 $z(PPN)201922533 035 $a(PPN)182920763 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001140816 100 $a20130312d2013 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAristotle's modal syllogistic /$fMarko Malink 210 1$aCambridge, Massachusetts :$cHarvard University Press,$d2013. 215 $a1 online resource (384 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-674-72454-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 337-347) and indexes. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tAbbreviations of Aristotle?s Works -- $tIntroduction -- $t1. Categorical Propositions -- $t2. The dictum de omni -- $t3. The Orthodox dictum Semantics -- $t4. The Heterodox dictum Semantics -- $t5. The Preorder Semantics -- $t6. Ecthesis -- $t7. The Apodeictic dictum de omni -- $t8. Barbara NXN and the Four Predicables -- $t9. Categories in the Topics -- $t10. Essence Terms and Substance Terms -- $t11. Universal Negative Necessity Propositions -- $t12. Particular Necessity Propositions -- $t13. Modal Opposition -- $t14. Establishing Inconcludence -- $t15. A Deductive System for the Modal Syllogistic -- $t16. The Validity of XQM-Moods -- $t17. Two-Sided Possibility Propositions -- $t18. One-Sided Possibility Propositions -- $tAppendix A: Aristotle?s Claims of Validity, Invalidity, and Inconcludence -- $tAppendix B: The Predicable Semantics of the Modal Syllogistic -- $tAppendix C: Aristotle?s Terms -- $tBibliography -- $tIndex of Names -- $tIndex of Passages -- $tIndex of Subjects 330 $aAristotle was the founder not only of logic but also of modal logic. In the Prior Analytics he developed a complex system of modal syllogistic which, while influential, has been disputed since antiquity--and is today widely regarded as incoherent. Combining analytic rigor with keen sensitivity to historical context, Marko Malink makes clear that the modal syllogistic forms a consistent, integrated system of logic, one that is closely related to other areas of Aristotle's philosophy. Aristotle's modal syllogistic differs significantly from modern modal logic. Malink considers the key to understanding the Aristotelian version to be the notion of predication discussed in the Topics--specifically, its theory of predicables (definition, genus, differentia, proprium, and accident) and the ten categories (substance, quantity, quality, and so on). The predicables introduce a distinction between essential and nonessential predication. In contrast, the categories distinguish between substantial and nonsubstantial predication. Malink builds on these insights in developing a semantics for Aristotle's modal propositions, one that verifies the ancient philosopher's claims of the validity and invalidity of modal inferences. While it acknowledges some limitations of this reconstruction, Aristotle's Modal Syllogistic brims with bold ideas, richly supported by close readings of the Greek texts. 606 $aLogic, Ancient 606 $aModality (Logic) 606 $aSyllogism 606 $aPredicate (Logic) 615 0$aLogic, Ancient. 615 0$aModality (Logic) 615 0$aSyllogism. 615 0$aPredicate (Logic) 676 $a160.92 700 $aMalink$b Marko$f1980-$01580597 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910790604303321 996 $aAristotle's modal syllogistic$93861594 997 $aUNINA