LEADER 03502nam 2200685 a 450 001 9910790461703321 005 20230725032601.0 010 $a0-7735-8135-9 024 7 $a10.1515/9780773581357 035 $a(CKB)2670000000148960 035 $a(EBL)3281437 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000693960 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11393994 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000693960 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10666143 035 $a(PQKB)10310700 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3332351 035 $a(CEL)436098 035 $a(OCoLC)772429682 035 $a(CaBNVSL)slc00230016 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3332351 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10577935 035 $a(OCoLC)923236947 035 $a(DE-B1597)654723 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780773581357 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000148960 100 $a20110330d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aTreaty no. 9$b[electronic resource] $emaking the agreement to share the land in far northern Ontario in 1905 /$fJohn S. Long 210 $aMontreal ;$aIthaca [N.Y.] $cMcGill-Queen's University Press$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (622 p.) 225 1 $aRupert's Land Record Society series ;$v12 311 $a0-7735-3761-9 311 $a0-7735-3760-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $apt. 1. Historical context -- pt. 2. Historical documents -- pt. 3. Trick or Treaty no. 9?. 330 $a"For more than a century, the vast lands of Northern Ontario have been shared among the governments of Canada, Ontario, and the First Nations who signed Treaty No. 9 in 1905. For just as long, details about the signing of the constitutionally recognized agreement have been known only through the accounts of two of the commissioners appointed by the Government of Canada. Treaty No. 9 provides a truer perspective on the treaty by adding the neglected account of a third commissioner and tracing the treaty's origins, negotiation, explanation, interpretation, signing, implementation, and recent commemoration." 330 8 $a"Restoring nearly forgotten perspectives to the historical record, John Long considers the methods used by the government of Canada to explain Treaty No. 9 to Northern Ontario First Nations. He shows that many crucial details about the treaty's contents were omitted in the transmission of writing to speech, while other promises were made orally but not included in the written treaty. Reproducing the three treaty commissioners' personal journals in their entirety, Long reveals the contradictions that suggest the treaty parchment was never fully explained to the First Nations who signed it."--pub. website. 410 0$aRupert's Land Record Society series ;$v12. 606 $aCree Indians$zOntario$xTreaties$xHistory 606 $aOjibwa Indians$zOntario$xTreaties$xHistory 606 $aCree Indians$zOntario$xGovernment relations 606 $aOjibwa Indians$zOntario$xGovernment relations 615 0$aCree Indians$xTreaties$xHistory. 615 0$aOjibwa Indians$xTreaties$xHistory. 615 0$aCree Indians$xGovernment relations. 615 0$aOjibwa Indians$xGovernment relations. 676 $a346.7104/3208997 700 $aLong$b John$f1948-$01488545 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910790461703321 996 $aTreaty no. 9$93708799 997 $aUNINA