LEADER 03271nam 2200613Ia 450 001 9910790120803321 005 20230801222418.0 010 $a1-280-57142-X 010 $a9786613601025 010 $a0-300-14990-5 024 7 $a10.12987/9780300149906 035 $a(CKB)2670000000176444 035 $a(StDuBDS)AH23056483 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000647393 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11442360 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000647393 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10593597 035 $a(PQKB)11451913 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3420833 035 $a(DE-B1597)485341 035 $a(OCoLC)784957804 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780300149906 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3420833 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10551231 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL360102 035 $a(OCoLC)923597981 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000176444 100 $a20110907d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aReclaiming the petition clause$b[electronic resource] $eseditious libel, "offensive" protest, and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances /$fRonald J. Krotoszynski, Jr 210 $aNew Haven $cYale University Press$dc2012 215 $a1 online resource (256 p.) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-300-14987-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tPreface -- $tAcknowledgments -- $t1. The Growing Marginalization of Dissent and the New Seditious Libel -- $t2. The Growing Loss of Public Space for Collective Expression of Dissent and the Failure of Contemporary First Amendment Doctrine to Address This Problematic Phenomenon -- $t3. Security as a Cellophane Wrapper: Deconstructing the Government's Security Rationale for Marginalizing Public Dissent and Dissenters -- $t4. The Right of Petition in Historical Perspective and Across Three Societies -- $t5. The Jurisprudential Contours of the Petition Clause: An Examination of the Potential Doctrinal Shape and Scope of a Reclaimed Petition Clause -- $t6. The Selma-to-Montgomery March as an Exemplar of Hybrid Petitioning -- $t7. Conclusion -- $tNotes -- $tIndex 330 $aSince the 2004 presidential campaign, when the Bush presidential advance team prevented anyone who seemed unsympathetic to their candidate from attending his ostensibly public appearances, it has become commonplace for law enforcement officers and political event sponsors to classify ordinary expressions of dissent as security threats and to try to keep officeholders as far removed from possible protest as they can. Thus without formally limiting free speech the government places arbitrary restrictions on how, when, and where such speech may occur. 606 $aPetition, Right of$zUnited States 606 $aPolitical rights$zUnited States 615 0$aPetition, Right of 615 0$aPolitical rights 676 $a323.4/80973 700 $aKrotoszynski$b Ronald J.$f1967-$01468613 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910790120803321 996 $aReclaiming the petition clause$93679899 997 $aUNINA