LEADER 04378nam 2200781 a 450 001 9910790090103321 005 20240110114033.0 010 $a1-283-11991-9 010 $a9786613119919 010 $a90-04-19007-4 024 7 $a10.1163/ej.9789004188655.i-328 035 $a(CKB)2670000000083428 035 $a(EBL)717626 035 $a(OCoLC)727948452 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000503022 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12194306 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000503022 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10458895 035 $a(PQKB)11300575 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC717626 035 $a(OCoLC)647901928 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004190078 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL717626 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10470521 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL311991 035 $a(PPN)174543409 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000083428 100 $a20100719d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aText comparison and digital creativity$b[electronic resource] $ethe production of presence and meaning in digital text scholarship /$fedited by Wido van Peursen, Ernst D. Thoutenhoofd, Adriaan van der Weel 210 $aLeiden ;$aBoston $cBrill$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (346 p.) 225 1 $aScholarly communication,$x1879-9027 ;$vv. 1 300 $aContributions triggered by an international colloquium titled 'Text Comparison and Digital Creativity, an International Colloquium on the Co-production of Presence and Meaning in Digital Text Scholarship', held in Amsterdam on 30 and 31 October 2008 on the occasion of the 200th anniversary of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW). 311 $a90-04-18865-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $apt. 1. Continuation and innovation in e-philology -- pt. 2. Scholarly and scientific research -- pt. 3. Case studies -- pt. 4. Wider perspectives on developments in digital text scholarship. 330 $aIn fourteen thoughtful essays this book reports and reflects on the many changes that a digital workflow brings to the world of original texts and textual scholarship, and the effect on scholarly communication practices. The spread of digital technology across philology, linguistics and literary studies suggests that text scholarship is taking on a more laboratory-like image. The ability to sort, quantify, reproduce and report text through computation would seem to facilitate the exploration of text as another type of quantitative scientific data. However, developing this potential also highlights text analysis and text interpretation as two increasingly separated sub-tasks in the study of texts. The implied dual nature of interpretation as the traditional, valued mode of scholarly text comparison, combined with an increasingly widespread reliance on digital text analysis as scientific mode of inquiry raises the question as to whether the reflexive concepts that are central to interpretation ? individualism, subjectivity ? are affected by the anonymised, normative assumptions implied by formal categorisations of text as digital data. 410 0$aScholarly communication ;$v1. 606 $aCriticism, Textual$xData processing 606 $aCommunication in learning and scholarship$xTechnological innovations 606 $aScholars$xEffect of technological innovations on 606 $aElectronic publications 606 $aManuscripts$xDigitization 606 $aEarly printed books$xDigitization 606 $aPhilology$xResearch$xMethodology 615 0$aCriticism, Textual$xData processing. 615 0$aCommunication in learning and scholarship$xTechnological innovations. 615 0$aScholars$xEffect of technological innovations on. 615 0$aElectronic publications. 615 0$aManuscripts$xDigitization. 615 0$aEarly printed books$xDigitization. 615 0$aPhilology$xResearch$xMethodology. 676 $a801/.9590285 701 $aPeursen$b W. Th. van$01095756 701 $aThoutenhoofd$b Ernst D$01486484 701 $aWeel$b Adriaan van der$01486485 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910790090103321 996 $aText comparison and digital creativity$93705966 997 $aUNINA