LEADER 05282nam 2200673 a 450 001 9910789887003321 005 20230725032553.0 010 $a1-283-40253-X 010 $a9786613402530 010 $a3-11-916597-2 010 $a3-11-026000-X 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110260007 035 $a(CKB)2670000000138749 035 $a(EBL)827324 035 $a(OCoLC)769343094 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000593806 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11369551 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000593806 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10547655 035 $a(PQKB)10081620 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC827324 035 $a(DE-B1597)171729 035 $a(OCoLC)853265915 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110260007 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL827324 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10521693 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL340253 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000138749 100 $a20120109d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurun#---|u||u 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aTort law in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights$b[electronic resource] /$fAttila Fenyves ... [et al.] (eds.) ; with contributions by Walter Berka ... [et al.] 210 $aVienna $cDe Gruyter$d2011 215 $a1 online resource (932 p.) 225 1 $aTort and insurance law,$x1616-8623 ;$vv. 30 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 0 $a3-11-025966-4 327 $tFront matter --$tPreface --$tTable of Contents --$tIntroduction --$tJust Satisfaction under Art 41 ECHR: A Compromise in 1950 - Problematic Now /$rSteiner, Elisabeth --$tFundamental Issues --$tMethodological Approaches to the Tort Law of the ECHR /$rBydlinski, Franz --$tMethodologische Ansätze zum Schadenersatzrecht der EMRK /$rBydlinski, Franz --$tHuman Rights and Tort Law /$rBerka, Walter --$tMenschenrechte und Schadenersatzrecht /$rBerka, Walter --$t'Just Satisfaction' in Art 41 ECHR and Public International Law - Issues of Interpretation and Review of International Materials /$rKarl, Wolfram --$tCan the Reparation Awarded to Victims of Violations under the ECHR be Considered a Real 'Just' Satisfaction? /$rde Salvia, Michel --$tSpecial Topics --$tDamage /$rOliphant, Ken / Ludwichowska, Katarzyna --$tCausation /$rKellner, Markus / Durant, Isabelle C. --$tWrongfulness and Fault /$rSteininger, Barbara C. / Wallner-Friedl, Nora --$tProtective Purpose of the Rule /$rFedtke, Jörg --$tNo-Fault or Strict Liability /$rHinghofer-Szalkay, Dagmar / Koch, Bernhard A. --$tCompensation for Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Loss /$rKissling, Christa / Kelliher, Denis --$tPunitive and Nominal Damages /$rWilcox, Vanessa --$tSatisfaction by Finding a Violation /$rJózon, Mónika --$tContributory Negligence /$rWilcox, Vanessa / Riss, Olaf --$tReduction of Damages /$rThiede, Thomas / Büyüksagis, Erdem --$tConcluding Remarks --$tConcluding Remarks Regarding the Methods of Interpreting Art 41 ECHR /$rKoziol, Helmut --$tConcluding Remarks on Damage /$rKarner, Ernst --$tConcluding Remarks on Causation /$rKarner, Ernst --$tConcluding Remarks on Wrongfulness and Fault /$rFenyves, Attila --$tConcluding Remarks on the Protective Purpose of the Rule /$rKarner, Ernst --$tConcluding Remarks on No-Fault or Strict Liability /$rKarner, Ernst --$tConcluding Remarks on Compensatory and Non-Compensatory Remedies /$rKoziol, Helmut --$tConcluding Remarks on Contributory Negligence and Reduction Clause /$rFenyves, Attila --$tIndex --$tPublications 330 $aThe goal of this study is to provide a general overview and thorough analysis of how the European Court of Human Rights deals with tort law issues such as damage, causation, wrongfulness and fault, the protective purpose of rules, remedies and the reduction of damages when applying art 41 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). These issues have been examined on the basis of a comprehensive selection and detailed analysis of the Court's judgments and the results compared with different European legal systems (Austria, Belgium, England and Wales, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Romania, Scandinavia, Spain, Switzerland and Turkey), EC Tort Law and the Principles of European Tort Law. The introduction of art 41 (ex art 50) ECHR in 1950 as a compromise and the issues it raises now, the methodological approaches to the tort law of the ECHR, the perspectives of human rights and tort law and public international law as well as the question of whether the reparation awarded to victims of ECHR violations can be considered real 'just' satisfaction are addressed in five special reports (two of which are also available in German). Concluding remarks try to summarise the outcome. 410 0$aTort and insurance law ;$vv. 30. 606 $aTorts$zEurope 610 $aTort Law. 615 0$aTorts 676 $a346.4033 676 $a346.7303 686 $aPS 4140$2rvk 701 $aFenyves$b Attila$01571363 701 $aBerka$b Walter$0566940 712 02$aEuropean Court of Human Rights. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910789887003321 996 $aTort law in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights$93845748 997 $aUNINA