LEADER 03426nam  2200757Ia 450 
001 9910789528803321
005 20230207214243.0
010   $a1-280-69804-7
010   $a9786613675002
010   $a0-8093-8599-6
035   $a(CKB)2670000000094531
035   $a(EBL)1354549
035   $a(OCoLC)730520018
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000681708
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12253558
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000681708
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10663311
035   $a(PQKB)10879083
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000525064
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11340968
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000525064
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10487687
035   $a(PQKB)11154352
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1354549
035   $a(OCoLC)623489089
035   $a(MdBmJHUP)muse3488
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1354549
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10575414
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL367500
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000094531
100   $a20100909e20101994  ub             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aProfessional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences$b[electronic resource] /$fSusan Peck MacDonald
205   $aPaperback ed.
210   $aCarbondale $cSouthern Illinois University Press$d2010
215   $a1 online resource (252 p.)
300   $aOriginally published: 1994.
311   $a0-8093-1930-6 
311   $a0-8093-3007-5 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aCover; Book Title; Copyright Page; Contents; Preface; 1. Introduction; 2. Patterns in Disciplinary Variation; Case Studies in Three Subfields; 3. Attachment Research: Compact Problem Definition in a Conceptually Driven Field; 4. Colonial New England Social History: The Problematics of Contemporary History Writing; 5. Renaissance New Historicism: Epistemic and Non epistemic Textual Patterns; Language; 6. Sentence-Level Differences in Disciplinary Knowledge Making; 7. Professional Styles and Their Consequences; Appendix; Notes; References; Index; Author Bio; Back Cover
330   $a    In Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Susan Peck MacDonald tackles important and often controversial contemporary questions regarding the rhetoric of inquiry, the social construction of knowledge, and the professionalization of the academy. MacDonald argues that the academy has devoted more effort to analyzing theory and method than to analyzing its own texts. Professional texts need further attention because they not only create but are also shaped by the knowledge that is special to each discipline. Her assumption is that knowledge-ma
606   $aAuthorship
606   $aHumanities literature$xAuthorship
606   $aSocial sciences$xAuthorship
606   $aScholarly publishing
606   $aAcademic writing
615  0$aAuthorship.
615  0$aHumanities literature$xAuthorship.
615  0$aSocial sciences$xAuthorship.
615  0$aScholarly publishing.
615  0$aAcademic writing.
676   $a808.066001
676   $a808/.066001
700   $aMacDonald$b Susan$0153650
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910789528803321
996   $aProfessional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences$93845954
997   $aUNINA