LEADER 02661oam 2200637I 450 001 9910462774003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-283-92016-6 010 $a0-203-07266-9 010 $a1-135-10054-3 024 7 $a10.4324/9780203072660 035 $a(CKB)2670000000315304 035 $a(EBL)1104804 035 $a(OCoLC)823390013 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000852372 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11464635 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000852372 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10852846 035 $a(PQKB)10410892 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1104804 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1104804 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10641643 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL423266 035 $a(OCoLC)823319189 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000315304 100 $a20180706e20131969 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aBertrand Russell's theory of knowledge /$fElizabeth Ramsden Eames 210 1$aAbingdon, Oxon :$cRoutledge,$d2013. 215 $a1 online resource (241 p.) 225 0 $aRoutledge library editions. Russell ;$vv. 2 300 $aFirst published in 1969 by George Allen and Unwin Ltd. 311 $a1-138-00817-6 311 $a0-415-66211-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aCover; Bertrand Russell's Theory Of Knowledge; Copyright; Preface; Contents; I. Introduction; II. The Nature of Philosophy; III. The Method of Analysis; IV. Russell's Empiricism; V. Realism; VI. Conclusion; Bibliography; Index 330 $aWhen future generations come to analyze and survey twentieth-century philosophy as a whole, Bertrand Russell's logic and theory of knowledge is assured a place of prime importance. Yet until this book was first published in 1969 no comprehensive treatment of his epistemology had appeared. Commentators on twentieth-century philosophy at the time assumed that Russell's important contributions to the theory of knowledge were made before 1921. This book challenges that assumption and draws attention to features of Russell's later work which were overlooked.The analysis starts with Russel 410 0$aRoutledge library editions.$pRussell. 606 $aKnowledge, Theory of 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aKnowledge, Theory of. 676 $a121.0924 676 $a121/.0924 676 $a192 700 $aEames$b Elizabeth Ramsden.$0460319 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910462774003321 996 $aBertrand Russell's theory of knowledge$92132160 997 $aUNINA LEADER 00876nam a2200229 a 4500 001 991003930149707536 008 035 $ab14410928-39ule_inst 040 $aBibl. Dip.le Aggr. Studi Umanistici$bita 082 0 $a949 100 1 $aGeorgantzis Petros A. $0791690 245 10$aSymboli Eis Tin Istorian Tis Xanthis /$cPetros A. Georgantzis 260 $aXanthi:$c1976 300 $a269 p.; $c24 cm. 650 $aMacedonia$xStoria 650 4$aGrecia$xStoria 907 $a.b14410928$b23-03-21$c23-03-21 912 $a991003930149707536 945 $aLE008 FL.M. Neogr. A 185$g1$i 2008000558376$lle008$og$pE35.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i15954481$z23-03-21 996 $aSymboli Eis Tin Istorian Tis Xanthis$91769842 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale008$b23-03-21$cm$da $e-$fgre$ggr $h0$i0 LEADER 04974nam 2200613 450 001 9910789364903321 005 20230801233030.0 010 $a0-309-21613-3 010 $a0-309-21611-7 035 $a(CKB)3710000000103233 035 $a(EBL)3379092 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000746513 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12316248 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000746513 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10863060 035 $a(PQKB)10744804 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3379092 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3379092 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10863740 035 $a(OCoLC)923287858 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000103233 100 $a20140503h20122012 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aMaking sense of ballistic missile defense $ean assessment of concepts and systems for U.S. boost-phase missile defense in comparison to other alternatives /$fCommittee on an Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council of the National Academies 210 1$aWashington, District of Columbia :$cNational Academies Press,$d[2012] 210 4$dİ2012 215 $a1 online resource (282 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-309-21610-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $a""Front Matter""; ""Preface""; ""Acknowledgment of Reviewers""; ""Contents""; ""Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 U.S. Boost-Phase Defense""; ""3 Alternatives to U.S. Boost-Phase Defense""; ""4 Comparison of Utility, Maturity, and Cost-Effectiveness""; ""5 Recommended Path Forward""; ""Unclassified Appendixes""; ""Appendix A: Terms of Reference""; ""Appendix B: Biographies of Committee Members and Staff""; ""Appendix C: Summary of Meetings""; ""Appendix D: Acronyms and Abbreviations""; ""Appendix E: System Cost Methodology"" 330 $a"The Committee on an Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives set forth to provide an assessment of the feasibility, practicality, and affordability of U.S. boost-phase missile defense compared with that of the U.S. non-boost missile defense when countering short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic missile threats from rogue states to deployed forces of the United States and its allies and defending the territory of the United States against limited ballistic missile attack. To provide a context for this analysis of present and proposed U.S. boost-phase and non-boost missile defense concepts and systems, the committee considered the following to be the missions for ballistic missile defense (BMD): protecting of the U.S. homeland against nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction (WMD); or conventional ballistic missile attacks; protection of U.S. forces, including military bases, logistics, command and control facilities, and deployed forces, including military bases, logistics, and command and control facilities. They also considered deployed forces themselves in theaters of operation against ballistic missile attacks armed with WMD or conventional munitions, and protection of U.S. allies, partners, and host nations against ballistic-missile-delivered WMD and conventional weapons. Consistent with U.S. policy and the congressional tasking, the committee conducted its analysis on the basis that it is not a mission of U.S. BMD systems to defend against large-scale deliberate nuclear attacks by Russia or China. Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives suggests that great care should be taken by the U.S. in ensuring that negotiations on space agreements not adversely impact missile defense effectiveness. This report also explains in further detail the findings of the committee, makes recommendations, and sets guidelines for the future of ballistic missile defense research."--Publisher's description. 606 $aBallistic missile defenses$zUnited States 606 $aBallistic missile early warning system$zUnited States 606 $aMilitary planning$zUnited States 606 $aMilitary policy 607 $aUnited States$xMilitary policy 615 0$aBallistic missile defenses 615 0$aBallistic missile early warning system 615 0$aMilitary planning 615 0$aMilitary policy. 676 $a358.1740973 712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommittee on an Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives, 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910789364903321 996 $aMaking sense of ballistic missile defense$93788911 997 $aUNINA