LEADER 04358nam 2200613 450 001 9910789352303321 005 20230801233005.0 010 $a0-309-26559-2 010 $a0-309-26557-6 035 $a(CKB)3710000000103428 035 $a(EBL)3379293 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000789117 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12380154 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000789117 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10723572 035 $a(PQKB)10526103 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3379293 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3379293 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10863952 035 $a(OCoLC)923290453 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000103428 100 $a20130212h20122012 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aNational summit on strategies to manage herbicide-resistant weeds $eproceedings of a workshop /$forganized by the Planning Committee for a National Summit on Strategies to Manage Herbicide-Resistant Weeds, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies 210 1$aWashington, District of Columbia :$cNational Academies Press,$d[2012] 210 4$dİ2012 215 $a1 online resource (66 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-309-26556-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aWelcome -- Herbicide resistance in weeds: what is the nature of the problem? -- The epidemiology of herbicide resistance -- The Australian experience of managing herbicide resistance and its contrasts with the United States -- Best management practices to control and combat resistance -- Addressing the pressing problem of herbicide resistance -- Panel 1: The impediments to using best management practices -- A social science perspective on weed management practices -- Panel 2: What approaches are most likely to encourage the adoption of best management practices? -- The land-grant approach. 330 $a"Preserving the efficacy of herbicides and of herbicide-resistance technology depends on awareness of the increasing resistance of weeds to herbicides used in agriculture and coordinated action to address the problem by individuals at the farm level and beyond. This summit served as a venue to bring the attention of important stakeholders to the issue and as an opportunity for experts from diverse disciplines to strategize in a coordinated way to address herbicide-resistant weeds. In convening stakeholders for this event, participants took a step toward a recommendation from the 2010 National Research Council report The Impact of Genetically Engineered Crops on Farm Sustainability in the United States that federal and state government agencies, private-sector technology developers, universities, farmer organizations, and other relevant stakeholders collaborate to document emerging weed-resistance problems and to develop cost-effective resistance-management programs and practices that preserve effective weed control. The summit provided the opportunity for stakeholders to explore the scientific basis of the emergence of herbicide resistance and to consider different perspectives on both opportunities and barriers to overcoming the problem of herbicide-resistant weeds. National Summit on Strategies to Manage Herbicide-Resistant Weeds contains a brief synopsis of key points made by each speaker at the summit."--Publisher's description. 606 $aHerbicide resistance 606 $aPlants$xEffect of herbicides on 606 $aCrops$xGenetic engineering$zUnited States 606 $aAgricultural biotechnology$zUnited States 615 0$aHerbicide resistance. 615 0$aPlants$xEffect of herbicides on. 615 0$aCrops$xGenetic engineering 615 0$aAgricultural biotechnology 676 $a632.954 712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bPlanning Committee for a National Summit on Strategies to Manage Herbicide-Resistant Weeds, 712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bBoard on Agriculture and Natural Resources, 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910789352303321 996 $aNational summit on strategies to manage herbicide-resistant weeds$93727111 997 $aUNINA