LEADER 04480oam  22011894  450 
001 9910788413003321
005 20230828232708.0
010   $a1-4623-6899-9
010   $a1-4527-5015-7
010   $a1-283-44979-X
010   $a9786613823649
010   $a1-4519-0806-7
035   $a(CKB)3360000000443360
035   $a(EBL)3014521
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001488865
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11904004
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001488865
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11452609
035   $a(PQKB)11774005
035   $a(OCoLC)694141222
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3014521
035   $a(IMF)WPIEE2006010
035   $a(EXLCZ)993360000000443360
100   $a20020129d2006      uf             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aWill the Doha Round Lead to Preference Erosion? /$fJohn Romalis, Mary Amiti
210  1$aWashington, D.C. :$cInternational Monetary Fund,$d2006.
215   $a1 online resource (41 p.)
225 1 $aIMF Working Papers
300   $a"January 2006."
311   $a1-4518-6270-9 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 38-39).
327   $a""Contents""; ""I. INTRODUCTION""; ""II. DATA DESCRIPTION AND RESEARCH STRATEGY""; ""III. RESULTS""; ""IV. CONCLUSIONS""; ""REFERENCES""
330 3 $aThis paper assesses the effects of reducing tariffs under the Doha Round on market access for developing countries. It shows that for many developing countries, actual preferential access is less generous than it appears because of low product coverage or complex rules of origin. Thus lowering tariffs under the multilateral system is likely to lead to a net increase in market access for many developing countries, with gains in market access offsetting losses from preference erosion. Furthermore, comparing various tariff-cutting proposals, the research shows that the largest gains in market access are generated by higher tariff cuts in agriculture.
410  0$aIMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;$vNo. 2006/010
606   $aTariff preferences$zDeveloping countries$xEconometric models
606   $aExports$zDeveloping countries$xEconometric models
606   $aExports and Imports$2imf
606   $aTaxation$2imf
606   $aEconomic Theory$2imf
606   $aTrade Policy$2imf
606   $aInternational Trade Organizations$2imf
606   $aEmpirical Studies of Trade$2imf
606   $aEconomic Integration$2imf
606   $aTrade: General$2imf
606   $aNeoclassical Models of Trade$2imf
606   $aAgriculture: Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis$2imf
606   $aPrices$2imf
606   $aPublic finance & taxation$2imf
606   $aInternational economics$2imf
606   $aEconomic theory & philosophy$2imf
606   $aTariffs$2imf
606   $aExports$2imf
606   $aComparative advantage$2imf
606   $aDemand elasticity$2imf
606   $aImports$2imf
606   $aTaxes$2imf
606   $aInternational trade$2imf
606   $aEconomic theory$2imf
606   $aTariff$2imf
606   $aElasticity$2imf
606   $aEconomics$2imf
607   $aUnited States$2imf
615  0$aTariff preferences$xEconometric models.
615  0$aExports$xEconometric models.
615  7$aExports and Imports
615  7$aTaxation
615  7$aEconomic Theory
615  7$aTrade Policy
615  7$aInternational Trade Organizations
615  7$aEmpirical Studies of Trade
615  7$aEconomic Integration
615  7$aTrade: General
615  7$aNeoclassical Models of Trade
615  7$aAgriculture: Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis
615  7$aPrices
615  7$aPublic finance & taxation
615  7$aInternational economics
615  7$aEconomic theory & philosophy
615  7$aTariffs
615  7$aExports
615  7$aComparative advantage
615  7$aDemand elasticity
615  7$aImports
615  7$aTaxes
615  7$aInternational trade
615  7$aEconomic theory
615  7$aTariff
615  7$aElasticity
615  7$aEconomics
700   $aRomalis$b John$01546568
701   $aAmiti$b Mary$01546569
712 02$aInternational Monetary Fund.$bResearch Dept.
801  0$bDcWaIMF
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910788413003321
996   $aWill the Doha Round Lead to Preference Erosion$93802266
997   $aUNINA