LEADER 00991nas0-2200337---450- 001 990000800170203316 005 19950413134356.8 011 $a0333-1512 020 $b83-11162 035 $a0080017 035 $aUSA010080017 035 $a(ALEPH)000080017USA01 035 $a0080017 100 $a19950413a19819999|||||ita|01 ba 101 $alat 102 $aIT 110 $aa a ||||||| 200 1 $aActa ad archeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia$eseries altera in 8.$fá cura dell'Înstitutum Romanum Norvegiae 207 0$a1.. 210 $aRoma$cG. Bretschneider$d1981- .. 215 $av.$cill.$d24 cm 300 $aPeriodicita non determinata 676 $a705$v18 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990000800170203316 959 $aSE 979 $aPATTY$b90$c20011210$lUSA01$h1119 979 $c20020403$lUSA01$h1726 979 $aPATRY$b90$c20040406$lUSA01$h1655 996 $aActa ad archeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia$9966330 997 $aUNISA LEADER 01306nam0-2200385---450- 001 990008255050403321 005 20100705123452.0 010 $a0-8218-3618-8 035 $a000825505 035 $aFED01000825505 035 $a(Aleph)000825505FED01 035 $a000825505 100 $a20060112d2005----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 102 $aUS 105 $aa---a---101yy 200 1 $aGroups languages algorithms$eAms-Asl Joint special session on interactions between logic, group theory, and computer science - January 16-19, 2003 Baltimore, Maryland$fA. V. Borovik, editor 210 $aProvidence$cAmerican mathematical society$dc2005 215 $aviii, 348 p.$d24 cm 225 1 $aContemporary mathematics$v378 610 0 $aTeoria dei gruppi$aCongressi 610 0 $aGruppi finiti$acongressi 676 $a512.2$v22 702 1$aBorovik,$bAlexandre V. 710 12$aAMS-ASL Joint Special Session on Interactions between Logic, Group Theory, and Computer Science$fJanuary 16-19,2003$eBaltimora$0499438 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990008255050403321 952 $aC-1-(378$b21200$fMA1 959 $aMA1 962 $a20B40 962 $a20E05 962 $a81P68 996 $aGroups languages algorithms$9743288 997 $aUNINA LEADER 05676oam 22007575 450 001 9910788081203321 005 20230126211028.0 010 $a1-4648-0415-X 024 7 $a10.1596/978-1-4648-0412-0 035 $a(CKB)2670000000577656 035 $a(EBL)1864175 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001403539 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11898195 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001403539 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11368601 035 $a(PQKB)10416125 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1864175 035 $a(DLC) 2014049641 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1864175 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10991639 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL664404 035 $a(OCoLC)898750360 035 $a(The World Bank)18399803 035 $a(US-djbf)18399803 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000577656 100 $a20141208d2014 uf 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aElite capture $eresidential tariff subsidies in India /$fKristy Mayer, Sudeshna Ghosh Banerjee, and Chris Trimble 210 1$aWashington, D.C. :$cWorld Bank,$d[2014] 215 $a1 online resource (pages cm) 225 0 $aIndia power sector review 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-4648-0412-5 311 $a1-322-33122-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aFront Cover; Contents; Foreword; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Executive Summary; Chapter 1 Introduction; Setting Residential Tariffs; Study Goal and Objectives; Data Sources; Terminology and Key Concepts; Targeting the Poor; Structure of This Report; Figures; Figure 1.1 BPL and APL Households across India, by Income Quintile, 2010; Annex 1A: National Sample Survey Description; Annex 1B: Technical Note on Matching Households and Tariff Schedules; Notes; Chapter 2 Patterns of Residential Consumption and Subsidy and Cost Trends; Residential Sector Profile 327 $aFigure 2.1 Electricity Consumption and Revenue to Utilities, by Sector, 2010 Figure 2.2 Electricity Access Rates for Selected States, 2010; Subsidy and Cost Trends; Figure 2.3 Recent Trend in Subsidy Incidence, by Income Quintile; Figure 2.4 Rapid Rise in Average Subsidy Cost; Figure 2.5 Increasing Cost of Electricity Supply and Falling Tariffs, 2005-10; Figure 2.6 Change in Electricity Access Rates, by Income Quintile, 2005 and 2010; Notes; Figure 2.7 Change in Average Electricity Consumption, by Income Quintile, 2005 and 2010; Chapter 3Residential Tariffs Overview; Tariff Structures 327 $aTariff Schedule Characteristics Figure 3.1 Features of Increasing Block Tariff, 2010; Figure 3.2 Types of IBT Schedules Implemented by States, 2010; Tables; Table 3.1 Examples of State Tariff Schedules Used in This Analysis; Table 3.2 Residential Tariff Schedule Types, 2010; How Fixed Charges Impact the Poor; Boxes; Box 3.1 Snapshot of BPL Tariff Programs; Figure 3.3 Example of Average Effective Tariffs, 2010; Table 3.3 Average Effective Tariff for Representative Monthly Consumption Levels, 2010; Concluding Remarks; Figure 3.4 Average Effective Tariffs for Urban Households in Rajasthan, 2010 327 $aAnnex 3A: State Tariff Schedules Notes; Chapter 4 Subsidy Size and Household Distribution; Average Supply Cost and Tariffs; Subsidy Prevalence and Magnitude; Figure 4.1 Average Supply Costs and Average Effective Tariffs for States, by Subsidy Size, 2010; Figure 4.2 Prevalence of State Subsidies, 2010; Figure 4.3 Magnitude of State Subsidies and Cross-Subsides, 2010; Figure 4.4 State Subsidy Groupings, by Prevalence and Magnitude, 2010; Distribution of Subsidies and Cross-Subsidies; Figure 4.5 Household Subsidy Coverage, 2010 327 $aFigure 4.6 Average Effective Tariffs and Subsidies with IBT Structure, 2010 Figure 4.7 Distribution of Subsidy Groups, by Income Quintile, 2010; Figure 4.8 Distribution of Subsidy Groups, by State, 2010; Concluding Remarks; Figure 4.9 Average Household Subsidy and Cross-Subsidy, by Income Quintile, 2010; Figure 4.10 Average Household Subsidy, by State, 2010; Chapter 5 Targeting of Subsidies; Subsidy Incidence; Box 5.1 Baseline Assumption: Accurate BPL Household Identification; Figure 5.1 Subsidy Incidence across India, 2010; Figure B5.1.1 Subsidy Incidence under BPL Misidentification, 2010 327 $aFigure 5.2 Subsidy Incidence in Selected States, 2010 330 $aIndia is home to one of the world's largest populations without electricity access. Traditionally, the Government of India has extended rural electrification using two instruments: consumption subsidies and free connections to households below the poverty line (BPL). This study centers on subsidies for electricity consumption, examine their size, frequency, and distribution to households. It uses poverty as a lens through which to focus more closely on these concepts, asking such questions as how well subsidies are targeted to BPL households. The study findings demonstrate that subsidies cover 410 0$aWorld Bank e-Library. 606 $aElectric utilities$zIndia 606 $aTariff$zIndia 606 $aSubsidies$zIndia 606 $aElite (Social sciences)$zIndia 615 0$aElectric utilities 615 0$aTariff 615 0$aSubsidies 615 0$aElite (Social sciences) 676 $a333.793/230954 700 $aMayer$b Kristy$01535161 702 $aBanerjee$b Sudeshna Ghosh$f1973- 702 $aTrimble$b Chris 801 0$bDLC 801 1$bDLC 801 2$bDLC 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910788081203321 996 $aElite capture$93783146 997 $aUNINA