LEADER 03692nam  2200685   450 
001 9910788044403321
005 20200903223051.0
010   $a90-04-28820-1
024 7 $a10.1163/9789004288201
035   $a(CKB)2670000000591676
035   $a(EBL)1936139
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001421426
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11843838
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001421426
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11425395
035   $a(PQKB)11225098
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1936139
035   $a(OCoLC)903962254$z(OCoLC)902957708
035   $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004288201
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1936139
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11014926
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL718584
035   $a(OCoLC)902957708
035   $a(PPN)195379381
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000591676
100   $a20150210h20152015  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 12$aA nascent common law $ethe process of decisionmaking in international legal disputes between states and foreign investors /$fby Fre?de?ric Gilles Sourgens
210  1$aLeiden, The Netherlands :$cKoninklijke Brill,$d2015.
210  4$d©2015
215   $a1 online resource (426 p.)
225 1 $aInternational Litigation in Practice,$x1874-0502 ;$vVolume 9
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a90-04-28819-8 
311   $a1-322-87302-X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aPreliminary Material -- 1 Critical Mass: The Unique Role of Investor-State Arbitration in International Law -- 2 Theoretical Underpinnings of the Adjudicatory Framework -- 3 Stability of the Adjudicatory Framework -- 4 Iura Novit Curia -- 5 The Problem of Jurisdictional Judgment -- 6 Proof of Consent -- 7 Establishment of Jurisdictional Facts -- 8 The Inductive Process of Jurisdictional Decisionmaking -- 9 The Precedent Problem -- 10 Law as Process -- 11 The Common Law Solution -- 12 Plus ça change, plus c?est la même chose -- Bibliography -- Index.
330   $aIn A Nascent Common Law: The Process of Decisionmaking in International Legal Disputes Between States and Foreign Investors Frédéric Gilles Sourgens submits that investor-state dispute resolution relies upon an inductive, common law decisionmaking process, which reveals a necessary plurality of first principles within investor-state dispute resolution. Relying upon, amongst others, Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations, the book explains how this plurality of first principles does not devolve into arbitrary indeterminacy. A Nascent Common Law provides an alternative account to current theoretical conceptions of investor-state arbitration. It explains that these theories cannot adequately resolve a key empirical challenge: tribunals frequently reach facially inconsistent results on similar questions of law. Sourgens makes an inductive approach, focused on the manner of decisionmaking by tribunals in the context of specific records that can explain this inconsistency.
410  0$aInternational litigation in practice ;$vVolume 9.
606   $aJudicial process
606   $aCommon law
606   $aJurisdiction (International law)
606   $aProcedure (Law)
615  0$aJudicial process.
615  0$aCommon law.
615  0$aJurisdiction (International law)
615  0$aProcedure (Law)
676   $a346/.092
700   $aSourgens$b Fre?de?ric Gilles$01553813
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910788044403321
996   $aA nascent common law$93814626
997   $aUNINA