LEADER 05671nam 2200721 450 001 9910787920603321 005 20230803200038.0 010 $a90-272-6955-6 035 $a(CKB)2670000000576709 035 $a(EBL)1847778 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001368850 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12603303 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001368850 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11287618 035 $a(PQKB)10777648 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1847778 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10985902 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL663022 035 $a(OCoLC)895661434 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1847778 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000576709 100 $a20140728h20142014 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aStability and divergence in language contact $efactors and mechanisms /$fedited by Kurt Braunmu?ller, University of Hamburg, Steffen Ho?der, University of Kiel, Karoline H. Ku?hl, University of Copenhagen 210 1$aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d[2014] 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (304 p.) 225 1 $aStudies in language variation,$x1872-9592 ;$vvolume 16 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-3496-5 311 $a1-322-31740-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $aStability and Divergence in Language Contact; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; Part I: Theoretical aspects; Part II: Empirical studies; Stability and/or divergence vs. convergence; Stability as a source of divergence; Partial convergence may create stable divergence; Stability and divergence in language contact; Dialect stability and divergence from the standard language; Dialect divergence; Language divergence; Part I. Theoretical aspects; Linguistic stability and divergence: An extended perspective on language contact 327 $a1. On the role of stability and divergence in language change research2. Factors and mechanisms relevant for linguistic change and stability; 2.1 The multilingual speaker as the locus of contact; 2.2 The role of intra- vs. extra-linguistic factors; 2.3 Multilingual competence and the construction of equivalences; 2.4 Motivations for language change and stability: The cognitive dimension; 2.5 Motivations for language change and stability: Prestige and attitudes; 2.6 Linguistic change and stability: Demographic, geographic and political factors 327 $a2.7 The role of standardisation and a roofing language2.8 Styles and registers; 3. Scenarios of linguistic stability and divergence; 3.1 Instances of divergence in language contact situations; 3.2 Examples of stability in language contact settings; 4. Stability and divergence in language contact: Towards a classification; 4.1 Contact-induced stability; 4.2 Stability despite contact; 4.3 Contact-induced divergence; 4.4 Divergence despite contact; 5. Conclusion; References; Convergence vs. divergence from a diasystematic perspective; 1. Introduction 327 $a2. Definition and types of convergence and divergence3. Convergence vs. pro-diasystematic change; 4. Exemples: Recent Low German; 4.1 Background; 4.2 Formal and functional convergence; 4.3 Functional convergence, formal con- or divergence; 4.4 Functional convergence, formal divergence; 5. Conclusion; References; Part II. Empirical studies; Stability and convergence in case marking: Low and High German; 1. Introduction; 2. Case marking in Low German and in Standard German; 3. Methodology; 3.1 Synchronic spoken corpus; 3.2 Diachronic spoken corpus; 4. Results; 4.1 Synchronic spoken corpus 327 $a4.2 Diachronic spoken corpus5. Discussion; References; Towards a typological classification of Judeo-Spanish: Analyzing syntax and prosody of Bulgarian judezmo; 1. Introduction; 2. State of the art; 2.1 Syntactic features; 2.1.1 Word-order in general; 2.1.2 Stylistic fronting (SF); 2.1.3 Clitic Distribution; 2.1.4 Clitic Climbing; 2.2 Phonology; 2.2.1 Segmental phonology; 2.2.2 Speech rhythm; 3. Data and methodology; 3.1 Speakers; 3.2 Grammaticality Judgment Task (GJT); 3.3 Speech data; 4. Results; 4.1 Syntax; 4.2 Vowel reduction and speech rhythm; 5. Summary and concluding remarks 327 $aReferences 330 $aComparing the evolution of differential object marking (DOM) in Spanishand Portuguese between the 16th and the 20th c. we discover great differencesbetween the two neighbor languages. Whereas in Spanish we notice a steadyincrease and high degree of grammaticalization of DOM, the graph for thedegree of grammaticalization of DOM in Portuguese resembles a standardizednormal Gaussian distribution with its peak in the 17th c. The increase of objectmarking until the 17th c. is in consequence of convergence towards Spanish dueto the high prestige of the latter language. From the 18th c. onwards diver 410 0$aStudies in language variation ;$vv. 16. 606 $aLanguages in contact 606 $aLinguistic change 606 $aBilingualism 606 $aIntercultural communication 615 0$aLanguages in contact. 615 0$aLinguistic change. 615 0$aBilingualism. 615 0$aIntercultural communication. 676 $a306.44 702 $aBraunmu?ller$b Kurt$f1948- 702 $aHo?der$b Steffen 702 $aKu?hl$b Karoline H. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910787920603321 996 $aStability and divergence in language contact$93786633 997 $aUNINA