LEADER 02834nam  2200529   450 
001 9910787708103321
005 20230803195434.0
010   $a3-95489-600-1
035   $a(CKB)2670000000534367
035   $a(EBL)1640381
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001215085
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11699400
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001215085
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11176976
035   $a(PQKB)10518244
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1640381
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1640381
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10856520
035   $a(OCoLC)871779990
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000534367
100   $a20140419h20142014  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aDoes an unconditional basic income provide higher effectiveness and efficiency? $ean analysis of the social security systems of Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom /$fWolfgang Mu?ller
210  1$aHamburg, Germany :$cAnchor Academic Publishing,$d2014.
210  4$dİ2014
215   $a1 online resource (81 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a3-95489-100-X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aDOES AN UNCONDITIONAL BASIC INCOME PROVIDE HIGHER EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY?; ABSTRACT; LIST OF CONTENTS; LIST OF FIGURES; 1. INTRODUCTION; OBJECTIVE; OUTLINE; 2. METHOD AND SELECTION; 3. UNCONDITIONAL BASIC INCOME; DEFINITION; DESIRABILITY; 4. WELFARE TYPES; WELFARE REGIMES; MIXED ECONOMY OF WELFARE; 5. SOCIAL SECURITY; AIMS, OBJECTIVES AND FUNCTIONS; 6. EFFECTIVENESS; POVERTY ALLEVIATION; INCOME REPLACEMENT; COMPENSATION; REDISTRIBUTION; RISK PROTECTION; BEHAVIOURAL CHANGE; 7. EFFICIENCY; TARGET EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY; ADMINISTRATIVE EFFICIENCY; 8. CONCLUSION; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
327   $aREFERENCES
330   $aThe current social security systems in Europe have not been able to deal with increased traditional and new risks such as unemployment or work-life balance. One suggested solution to this problem has gained more popular and academic support in recent years: the idea of a universal, unconditional basic income (UBI). This study, therefore, examines whether and how UBI could support social security systems in the UK, Germany and Sweden in order to achieve their aims and fulfill their functions. Since effectiveness and efficiency describe the functionality of social security systems, the study
606   $aIncome$zGermany
615  0$aIncome
676   $a339.20943
700   $aMu?ller$b Wolfgang$0433840
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910787708103321
996   $aDoes an unconditional basic income provide higher effectiveness and efficiency$93690938
997   $aUNINA