LEADER 01070nam--2200385---450- 001 990001309660203316 005 20060113153904.0 035 $a000130966 035 $aUSA01000130966 035 $a(ALEPH)000130966USA01 035 $a000130966 100 $a20031219d1930----km-y0itay0103----ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $a||||||||001yy 200 1 $aArchitettura d'oggi$fMarcello Piacentini 210 $aRoma$cP. Cremonese$d1930 215 $a72 p., [64] c. di tav.$cill.$d18 cm 225 2 $aPrisma 410 0$12001$aPrisma 454 1$12001 461 1$1001-------$12001 606 0 $aArchitettura$z1920-1930 676 $a724.91 700 1$aPIACENTINI,$bMarcello$03712 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990001309660203316 951 $aXII.2.C. 490(VII E 97)$b40550 L.M.$cVII E 959 $aBK 969 $aUMA 979 $aSIAV5$b10$c20031219$lUSA01$h0947 979 $aPATRY$b90$c20040406$lUSA01$h1733 979 $aCOPAT6$b90$c20060113$lUSA01$h1539 996 $aArchitettura d'oggi$9351068 997 $aUNISA LEADER 02834nam 2200529 450 001 9910787708103321 005 20230803195434.0 010 $a3-95489-600-1 035 $a(CKB)2670000000534367 035 $a(EBL)1640381 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001215085 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11699400 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001215085 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11176976 035 $a(PQKB)10518244 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1640381 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1640381 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10856520 035 $a(OCoLC)871779990 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000534367 100 $a20140419h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDoes an unconditional basic income provide higher effectiveness and efficiency? $ean analysis of the social security systems of Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom /$fWolfgang Mu?ller 210 1$aHamburg, Germany :$cAnchor Academic Publishing,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (81 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-95489-100-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aDOES AN UNCONDITIONAL BASIC INCOME PROVIDE HIGHER EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY?; ABSTRACT; LIST OF CONTENTS; LIST OF FIGURES; 1. INTRODUCTION; OBJECTIVE; OUTLINE; 2. METHOD AND SELECTION; 3. UNCONDITIONAL BASIC INCOME; DEFINITION; DESIRABILITY; 4. WELFARE TYPES; WELFARE REGIMES; MIXED ECONOMY OF WELFARE; 5. SOCIAL SECURITY; AIMS, OBJECTIVES AND FUNCTIONS; 6. EFFECTIVENESS; POVERTY ALLEVIATION; INCOME REPLACEMENT; COMPENSATION; REDISTRIBUTION; RISK PROTECTION; BEHAVIOURAL CHANGE; 7. EFFICIENCY; TARGET EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY; ADMINISTRATIVE EFFICIENCY; 8. CONCLUSION; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 327 $aREFERENCES 330 $aThe current social security systems in Europe have not been able to deal with increased traditional and new risks such as unemployment or work-life balance. One suggested solution to this problem has gained more popular and academic support in recent years: the idea of a universal, unconditional basic income (UBI). This study, therefore, examines whether and how UBI could support social security systems in the UK, Germany and Sweden in order to achieve their aims and fulfill their functions. Since effectiveness and efficiency describe the functionality of social security systems, the study 606 $aIncome$zGermany 615 0$aIncome 676 $a339.20943 700 $aMu?ller$b Wolfgang$0433840 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910787708103321 996 $aDoes an unconditional basic income provide higher effectiveness and efficiency$93690938 997 $aUNINA