LEADER 06319nam 2200649 450 001 9910787421103321 005 20200903223051.0 010 $a90-04-29110-5 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004291102 035 $a(CKB)3710000000346386 035 $a(EBL)1956712 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001421564 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11934159 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001421564 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11424596 035 $a(PQKB)10671799 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1956712 035 $a(OCoLC)899114031$z(OCoLC)904036884$z(OCoLC)907139434 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004291102 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1956712 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11021026 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL729777 035 $a(OCoLC)905856244 035 $a(PPN)195379454 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000346386 100 $a20150227h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aReshaping the investor-state dispute settlement system $ejourneys for the 21st century /$fedited by Jean E. Kalicki and Anna Joubin-Bret 210 1$aLeiden, Netherlands ;$aBoston, [Massachusetts] :$cBrill Nijhoff,$d2015. 210 4$d©2015 215 $a1 online resource (1043 p.) 225 1 $aNijhoff International Investment Law Series,$x2351-9542 ;$vVolume 4 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-04-29109-1 311 $a1-322-98495-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tPreliminary Material -- $tIntroduction /$rAnna Joubin-Bret and Jean E. Kalicki -- $t1 Delegating Interpretative Authority in Investment Treaties: The Case of Joint Administrative Commissions /$rAnne van Aaken -- $t2 Lessons from International Uniform Law /$rJoshua Karton -- $t3 Which Is to Be the Master? Extra-Arbitral Interpretative Procedures for IIAs /$rMichael Ewing-Chow and Junianto James Losari -- $t4 Keeping Interpretation in Investment Treaty Arbitration ?on Track?: The Role of State Parties /$rTomoko Ishikawa -- $t5 Travaux Préparatoires and the Legitimacy of Investor-State Arbitration /$rBaiju S. Vasani and Anastasiya Ugale -- $t6 Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: The U.S. Experience /$rKaren L. Kizer and Jeremy K. Sharpe -- $t7 Rethinking Rights and Responsibilities in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Some Model International Investment Agreement Provisions /$rElizabeth Boomer -- $t8 Examining the Formative Aspect of Investment Treaty Commitments: Lessons from Commercial Law and Trade Law /$rLocknie Hsu -- $t9 Limiting Investor Access to Investment Arbitration: A Solution without a Problem? /$rLiang-Ying Tan and Amal Bouchenaki -- $t10 Back to the Future: Contemplating a Return to the Exhaustion Rule /$rDaniel Kalderimis -- $t11 ISDS Growing Pains and Responsible Adulthood /$rSilvia Constain -- $t12 In Search of a Model for the Reform of International Investment Dispute Resolution: An Analysis of Existing International and Regional Dispute Settlement Mechanisms /$rNicolette Butler -- $t13 The Abiding Role of State-State Engagement in the Resolution of Investor-State Disputes /$rTheodore R. Posner and Marguerite C. Walter -- $t14 Permanent Investment Tribunals: The Momentum is Building Up /$rOmar E. García-Bolívar -- $t15 The Challenges of Creating a Standing International Investment Court /$rEduardo Zuleta -- $t16 Making Impossible Investor-State Reform Possible /$rLuis González García -- $t17 Appellate Mechanisms for Investment Arbitration: Worth a Second Look for the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Proposed EU-U.S. FTA? /$rBarton Legum -- $t18 Appellate Review in Investor-State Arbitration /$rEun Young Park -- $t19 Reform of the Investor-State Arbitration Regime: The Appeal Proposal /$rGabriel Bottini -- $t20 Introduction of an Appellate Review Mechanism for International Investment Disputes: Expected Benefits and Remaining Tasks /$rJaemin Lee -- $t21 Why ICSID Doesn?t Need an Appellate Procedure, and What to Do Instead /$rKristina An?eli -- $t22 Fragmentation and Harmonization in the ICSID Decision-Making Process /$rRoberto Castro de Figueiredo -- $t23 Initial Hiccups or More? Efforts of the EU to Find Its Future Role in International Investment Law /$rJan Asmus Bischoff -- $t24 The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Critique of the Debate Over Reform of the ISDS System /$rJ.J. Saulino and Josh Kallmer -- $t25 Advancing Reform at ICSID /$rAntonio R. Parra -- $t26 UN Commission on International Trade Law and Multilateral Rule-making: Consensus, Sovereignty and the Role of International Organizations in the Preparation of the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency /$rJulia Salasky and Corinne Montineri -- $t27 Inter-Governmental Evaluation of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Recent Work at the OECD-Hosted Freedom of Investment Roundtable /$rDavid Gaukrodger and Kathryn Gordon. 330 $aIn Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System: Journeys for the 21st Century , editors Jean E. Kalicki and Anna Joubin-Bret offer for the first time a broad compendium of practical suggestions for reform of the current system of resolving international investment treaty disputes. The increase in cases against States and their challenge to public policy measures has generated a strong debate, usually framed by complaints about a perceived lack of legitimacy, consistency and predictability. While some ideas have been proposed for improvement, there has never before been a book systematically focusing on constructive paths forward. This volume features 38 chapters by almost 50 leading contributors, all offering concrete proposals to improve the ISDS system for the 21st century. 410 0$aNijhoff international investment law series ;$vVolume 4. 606 $aInvestments, Foreign (International law) 606 $aInternational commercial arbitration 615 0$aInvestments, Foreign (International law) 615 0$aInternational commercial arbitration. 676 $a346/.092 702 $aKalicki$b Jean E. 702 $aJoubin-Bret$b Anna 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910787421103321 996 $aReshaping the investor-state dispute settlement system$93791471 997 $aUNINA