LEADER 02359nam  2200601   450 
001 9910787257003321
005 20230807212117.0
010   $a0-19-877717-5
010   $a0-19-104469-5
010   $a0-19-104468-7
035   $a(CKB)3710000000291001
035   $a(EBL)1876206
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001415518
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11829651
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001415518
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11362075
035   $a(PQKB)11696308
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1876206
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1876206
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10991247
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL732831
035   $a(OCoLC)899007217
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000291001
100   $a20140908d2015      uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aTetralogue $eI'm right, you're wrong /$fTimothy Williamson
205   $aFirst edition.
210  1$aNew York, New York :$cOxford University Press,$d2015.
215   $a1 online resource (161 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-336-01549-7 
311   $a0-19-872888-3 
327   $aPart I. The perils of peacemaking -- Part II. The terrors of truth -- Part III. The advantages of arrogance -- Part IV. The vices of value.
330   $aFour people with radically different outlooks on the world meet on a train and start talking about what they believe. Their conversation varies from cool logical reasoning to heated personal confrontation. Each starts off convinced that he or she is right, but then doubts creep in. In a tradition going back to Plato, Timothy Williamson uses a fictional conversation to explore questions about truth and falsity, and knowledge and belief. Is truth always relative to a point of view? Is every opinion fallible? Such ideas have been used to combat dogmatism and intolerance, but are they compatible w
606   $aDogmatism
606   $aPhilosophy
606   $aThought and thinking
615  0$aDogmatism.
615  0$aPhilosophy.
615  0$aThought and thinking.
676   $a100
700   $aWilliamson$b Timothy$0562832
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910787257003321
996   $aTetralogue$91504966
997   $aUNINA