LEADER 03752nam 2200757 450 001 9910787204803321 005 20230508051453.0 010 $a1-4426-5977-7 010 $a1-4426-5519-4 024 7 $a10.3138/9781442659773 035 $a(CKB)3710000000324297 035 $a(EBL)3296663 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001403872 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12599335 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001403872 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11368108 035 $a(PQKB)10870072 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4670127 035 $a(CEL)449220 035 $a(OCoLC)903441167 035 $a(CaBNVSL)thg00916087 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3296663 035 $a(DE-B1597)465601 035 $a(OCoLC)944178572 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781442659773 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4670127 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11256641 035 $a(OCoLC)958514591 035 $a(OCoLC)903968047 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)musev2_106924 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000324297 100 $a20160922h19981998 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe problem of difference $ephenomenology and poststructuralism /$fJeffrey A. Bell 210 1$aToronto, [Ontario] ;$aBuffalo, [New York] ;$aLondon, [England] :$cUniversity of Toronto Press,$d1998. 210 4$dİ1998 215 $a1 online resource (307 p.) 225 1 $aToronto Studies in Philosophy 311 $a0-8020-4253-8 311 $a0-8020-8095-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aIntroduction: the problem of difference -- Husserl -- Merleau-Ponty -- The poststructuralist turn -- Conclusion: the search for 'Rosebud.' 330 $aBeginning with Plato and Aristotle, philosophers throughout history have built their theories around the problem of reconciling a fundamental distinction, as for example, Plato's distinction between knowledge (reality) and opinion (appearance), Descarte's mind/body distinction, and Kant's a priori/a posteriori distinction. This 'problem of difference' is a classic theme in philosophy, and one that has taken especially intriguing turns in recent decades. Jeffrey A. Bell here presents a finely constructed survey of the contemporary continental philosophers, focusing on how they have dealt with the problem of difference. Bell's work centres around three key figures - Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, and Deleuze. He also considers the positions of such thinkers as Foucault, Derrida, and Rorty, who have called for an end to the traditional response to the problem of difference - an end to the search for any ultimate foundations on which our varied and different experiences of the world might be based - and thus, in effect, an end to traditional philosophy.In clarifying the relationship between phenomenology and poststructuralism, Bell analyses the role of paradox in both traditions, in particular the role it plays in accounting for difference. Not only philosophers, but also teachers and students in the area of comparative literary they will benefit from this book. 410 0$aToronto studies in philosophy. 606 $aDifference (Philosophy)$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aPhenomenology 606 $aPoststructuralism 608 $aHistory. 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aDifference (Philosophy)$xHistory 615 0$aPhenomenology. 615 0$aPoststructuralism. 676 $a190/.9/04 700 $aBell$b Jeffrey A.$01134010 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910787204803321 996 $aThe problem of difference$93684697 997 $aUNINA 999 $p$73.00$u01/16/2020$5Relig