LEADER 05343nam 2200649 450 001 9910787107403321 005 20230803212239.0 010 $a90-272-6926-2 035 $a(CKB)3710000000311894 035 $a(EBL)1882658 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001381883 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12620291 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001381883 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11438218 035 $a(PQKB)10911405 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1882658 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10993883 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL680318 035 $a(OCoLC)897814642 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1882658 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000311894 100 $a20141218h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aRomance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012 $eselected papers from 'Going Romance' Leuven 2012 /$fedited by Karen Lahousse, Stefania Marzo 210 1$aAmsterdam, Netherlands ;$aPhiladelphia, Pennsylavania :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (261 p.) 225 1 $aRomance Languages and Linguistic,$x1574-552x ;$vVolume 6 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-322-49036-8 311 $a90-272-0386-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. 327 $aRomance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of content; Issues in Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory; References; Clausal domains and clitic placement generalizations in Romance; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Background: Object clitics and functional heads; 1.2 Variation in object clitic placement; 1.3 Possible approaches to the question; 2. Low OCL placement dialects (the "Borgomanerese-type" language); 2.1 OCL placement in simple tense clauses in Northeast Piedmont; 2.1.1 An up-close look at one of these varieties: Borgomanerese simple tense clauses 327 $a2.2 OCL placement in compound tense clauses in Borgomanerese-type varieties and in Piedmontese 3. A first attempt at an approach to the question of variation in OCL placement (the Missing-Head Hypothesis); 3.1 Problems with the Missing-Head Hypothesis; 3.1.1 Cross-linguistic entailment; 3.1.2 Cross-linguistic entailment unidirectional; 3.1.3 Predictions of Missing-Head Hypothesis; 4. The feature content hypothesis: All languages have the same potential OCL adjunction sites; 4.1 Back to the cross-linguistic generalization 327 $a4.2 Eligibility of a particular functional head for OCL adjunction: The feature content hypothesis4.2.1 Simple tense clauses; 4.2.2 Compound tense clauses and the uni-directional entailment; 4.2.2.1 Borgomanerese compound tense clauses. As discussed earlier, following Kayne (1993), Rizzi (2000), and Tortora (2010), I take compound tense clauses to be "lightly" bi-clausal, whereby the participial clause has a bit of functional architecture pro 327 $a4.2.2.2 Piedmontese (compound tense clause). As noted above, non-Borgomanerese-type Piedmontese dialects exhibit enclisis of the OCL on the participle in compound tense clauses (see (18) through (21)). This is despite the fact that they exhibit proclisis4.2.2.3 Rounding out the picture: Italian (compound tense clause). As already noted, the OCL is obligatorily proclitic on the "matrix" auxiliary verb in Italian compound tense clauses. Under the approach advocated for here, this would mean that the Italia 327 $a4.2.2.4 Absolute Small Clauses (ASCs). Although Italian does not allow enclisis on past participles in the compound tenses, it is well known that it requires enclisis on participles in Absolute Small Clauses (Belletti 1990):4.2.2.5 Romance Imperatives. It is also well known that all Romance behaves like Borgomanerese-type languages when it comes to Imperatives. That is, Romance Imperatives robustly exhibit OCL enclisis:; 5. Another prediction made by Feature Spreading/Feature Content Hypotheses for causatives; 5.1 Obligatory clitic climbing in Romance Causatives 327 $a5.2 Causatives in Borgomanerese-type dialects and the Feature Content Hypothesis 330 $aThis investigation constitutes a quantitative variationist approach toward Spanish in contact with Catalan in Barcelona, Spain. It seeks to empirically measure concrete usage patterns of two phonetic variants, [B;] and [z], in the Spanish of Catalan-Spanish bilinguals, as well as establish the extent to which both variants are conditioned by linguistic factors and Catalan dominance. The careful Spanish speech of 20 Barcelonan females (ages 18-27) was elicited through a word-reading task. Goldvarb binomial logistic regression analyses revealed that sensitivity to linguistic factors varied accord 410 0$aGoing Romance.$pRomance languages and linguistic theory ;$vVolume 6. 606 $aRomance languages$vCongresses 615 0$aRomance languages 676 $a440 702 $aLahousse$b Karen$f1976- 702 $aMarzo$b Stefania 712 12$aGoing Romance (Conference) 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910787107403321 996 $aRomance languages and linguistic theory 2012$91577380 997 $aUNINA