LEADER 03889oam 2200721I 450 001 9910787063703321 005 20190503073422.0 010 $a0-262-32557-8 010 $a0-262-52941-6 010 $a0-262-32556-X 035 $a(CKB)3710000000244186 035 $a(EBL)3339864 035 $a(OCoLC)891743001 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001351435 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11871054 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001351435 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11301142 035 $a(PQKB)11420101 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3339864 035 $a(OCoLC)891743001$z(OCoLC)892045821$z(OCoLC)907539182 035 $a(OCoLC-P)891743001 035 $a(MaCbMITP)9688 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3339864 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10938261 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL646388 035 $a(PPN)230157750 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000244186 100 $a20141001h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDisconnected $eyouth, new media, and the ethics gap /$fCarrie James 210 1$aCambridge, Massachusetts :$cThe MIT Press,$d[2014] 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (199 p.) 225 1 $aThe John D. and Catherine T. Macarthur Foundation series on digital media and learning 300 $aIncludes index. 311 $a1-322-15133-4 311 $a0-262-02806-9 327 $aContents; Series Foreword; Foreword: What Were They Thinking?; Acknowledgments; 1 Morality, Ethics, and Digital Life; 2 Privacy; 3 Property; 4 Participation; 5 Correcting the Blind Spots, Reconnecting the Disconnects; Appendix: About the Research; Notes; Index 330 $aHow young people think about the moral and ethical dilemmas they encounter when they share and use online content and participate in online communities. 330 $a"Drawing on extensive interviews with young people between the ages of 10 and 25, James describes the nature of their thinking about privacy, property, and participation online. She identifies three ways that young people approach online activities. A teen might practice self-focused thinking, concerned mostly about consequences for herself; moral thinking, concerned about the consequences for people he knows; or ethical thinking, concerned about unknown individuals and larger communities. James finds, among other things, that youth are often blind to moral or ethical concerns about privacy; that attitudes toward property range from "what's theirs is theirs" to "free for all"; that hostile speech can be met with a belief that online content is "just a joke"; and that adults who are consulted about such dilemmas often emphasize personal safety issues over online ethics and citizenship. Considering ways to address the digital ethics gap, James offers a vision of conscientious connectivity, which involves ethical thinking skills but, perhaps more important, is marked by sensitivity to the dilemmas posed by online life, a motivation to wrestle with them, and a sense of moral agency that supports socially positive online actions."--Publisher's description. 410 0$aJohn D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation series on digital media and learning. 606 $aInternet and youth 606 $aInternet$xMoral and ethical aspects 606 $aParental influences 610 $aEDUCATION/General 610 $aDIGITAL HUMANITIES & NEW MEDIA/Social Media & Networking 610 $aPHILOSOPHY/Ethics & Bioethics 615 0$aInternet and youth. 615 0$aInternet$xMoral and ethical aspects. 615 0$aParental influences. 676 $a004.67/80835 686 $a004.678083 JAM 700 $aJames$b Carrie$0864643 801 0$bOCoLC-P 801 1$bOCoLC-P 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910787063703321 996 $aDisconnected$93717861 997 $aUNINA