LEADER 04317nam 2200745Ia 450 001 9910786936003321 005 20230516181848.0 010 $a0-8047-8676-3 024 7 $a10.1515/9780804786768 035 $a(CKB)2670000000389962 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000918390 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12467261 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000918390 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10906791 035 $a(PQKB)11495447 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1211881 035 $a(DE-B1597)564348 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780804786768 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1211881 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10739140 035 $a(OCoLC)851972017 035 $a(OCoLC)1178770001 035 $a(PPN)178288365 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000389962 100 $a20121030d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aMilitary adaptation in Afghanistan 210 $aStanford, Calif$cStanford Security Studies$d2013 215 $a1 Online Resource 345 p 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 0 $a0-8047-8588-0 311 0 $a0-8047-8589-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tAcknowledgments --$tContributors --$tAbbreviations --$t1. Introduction: Military Adaptation in War --$t2. The Great Game and the Quagmire: Military Adaptation in the British and Soviet Wars in Afghanistan, 1839 ?1989 --$t3. Into the Great Wadi: The United States and the War in Afghanistan --$t4. ISAF and NATO : Campaign Innovation and Organizational Adaptation --$t5. Back from the Brink: British Military Adaptation and the Struggle for Helmand, 2006?2011 --$t6. The Military Metier: Second Order Adaptation and the Danish Experience in Task Force Helmand --$t7. Soft Power, the Hard Way: Adaptation by the Netherlands? Task Force Uruzgan --$t8. Mission Command without a Mission: German Military Adaptation in Afghanistan --$t9. Canadian Forces in Afghanistan: Minority Government and Generational Change while under Fire --$t10. Military Adaptation by the Taliban, 2002?2011 --$t11. Shoulder-to-Shoulder Fighting Different Wars: NATO Advisors and Military Adaptation in the Afghan National Army, 2001?2011 --$t12. Conclusion: Military Adaptation and the War in Afghanistan --$tIndex 330 $aWhen NATO took charge of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) for Afghanistan in 2003, ISAF conceptualized its mission largely as a stabilization and reconstruction deployment. However, as the campaign has evolved and the insurgency has proved to more resistant and capable, key operational imperatives have emerged, including military support to the civilian development effort, closer partnering with Afghan security forces, and greater military restraint. All participating militaries have adapted, to varying extents, to these campaign imperatives and pressures. This book analyzes these initiatives and their outcomes by focusing on the experiences of three groups of militaries: those of Britain, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, and the US, which have faced the most intense operational and strategic pressures; Germany, who's troops have faced the greatest political and cultural constraints; and the Afghan National Army (ANA) and the Taliban, who have been forced to adapt to a very different sets of circumstances. 606 $aAfghan War, 2001-2021$2FBC 606 $aOperational art (Military science)$vCase studies$2FBC 606 $aTactics$vCase studies$2FBC 606 $aMilitary policy$vCase studies 606 $aAfghanistankrigen 2001-2020$2FBC 606 $aKrigskunst$2FBC 606 $aTaktik$2FBC 615 7$aAfghan War, 2001-2021. 615 7$aOperational art (Military science) 615 7$aTactics 615 0$aMilitary policy 615 7$aAfghanistankrigen 2001-2020 615 7$aKrigskunst 615 7$aTaktik 676 $a958.104/74 686 $a958$2z 702 $aFarrell$b Theo 702 $aOsinga$b Frans P. B 702 $aRussell$b James A 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910786936003321 996 $aMilitary adaptation in Afghanistan$93778812 997 $aUNINA