LEADER 06823nam  2201585   450 
001 9910786788803321
005 20230629171929.0
010   $a0-691-15976-9
010   $a1-4008-5269-2
024 7 $a10.1515/9781400852697
035   $a(CKB)3710000000202082
035   $a(EBL)1689374
035   $a(OCoLC)884280093
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001267816
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12477804
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001267816
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11264694
035   $a(PQKB)10169113
035   $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000977497
035   $a(MdBmJHUP)muse43288
035   $a(DE-B1597)454044
035   $a(OCoLC)984653306
035   $a(DE-B1597)9781400852697
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1689374
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10896848
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL630107
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1689374
035   $a(dli)HEB34118
035   $a(MiU)MIU01200000000000000000101
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000202082
100   $a20140730h20142014  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|nu---|u||u
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 14$aThe silent sex $egender, deliberation, and institutions /$fChristopher F. Karpowitz and Tali Mendelberg
205   $aPilot project. eBook available to selected US libraries only
210  1$aPrinceton, New Jersey ;$aOxfordshire, England :$cPrinceton University Press,$d2014.
210  4$dİ2014
215   $a1 online resource (469 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311 0 $a1-306-98856-X 
311 0 $a0-691-15975-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tFront matter --$tContents --$tIllustrations --$tTables --$tAcknowledgments --$tIntroduction --$tChapter 1. The Problem --$tChapter 2. The Sources of the Gender Gap in Political Participation --$tChapter 3. Why Women Don't Speak --$tChapter 4. The Deliberative Justice Experiment --$tChapter 5. Speech as a Form of Participation: Floor Time and Perceived Influence --$tChapter 6. What Makes Women the "Silent Sex" When Their Status Is Low? --$tChapter 7. Does Descriptive Representation Facilitate Women's Distinctive Voice? --$tChapter 8. Unpacking the Black Box of Interaction --$tChapter 9. When Women Speak, Groups Listen-Sometimes: How and When Women's Voice Shapes the Group's Generosity --$tChapter 10. Gender Inequality in School Boards --$tConclusion --$tAppendixes --$tIndex
330   $aDo women participate in and influence meetings equally with men? Does gender shape how a meeting is run and whose voices are heard? The Silent Sex shows how the gender composition and rules of a deliberative body dramatically affect who speaks, how the group interacts, the kinds of issues the group takes up, whose voices prevail, and what the group ultimately decides. It argues that efforts to improve the representation of women will fall short unless they address institutional rules that impede women's voices. Using groundbreaking experimental research supplemented with analysis of school boards, Christopher Karpowitz and Tali Mendelberg demonstrate how the effects of rules depend on women's numbers, so that small numbers are not fatal with a consensus process, but consensus is not always beneficial when there are large numbers of women. Men and women enter deliberative settings facing different expectations about their influence and authority. Karpowitz and Mendelberg reveal how the wrong institutional rules can exacerbate women's deficit of authority while the right rules can close it, and, in the process, establish more cooperative norms of group behavior and more generous policies for the disadvantaged. Rules and numbers have far-reaching implications for the representation of women and their interests. Bringing clarity and insight to one of today's most contentious debates, The Silent Sex provides important new findings on ways to bring women's voices into the conversation on matters of common concern.
606   $aCorporate meetings
606   $aWomen
606   $aSocial participation
606   $aSocial interaction
606   $aSocial groups
606   $aSocial psychology
610   $aAmerican politics.
610   $aAmerican women.
610   $aadvanced economies.
610   $aall-female groups.
610   $aauthoritative representation.
610   $aauthority.
610   $achildren.
610   $acivic activists.
610   $acivic organizations.
610   $aclass privileges.
610   $acompassion issues.
610   $aconfidence.
610   $aconfident participants.
610   $aconsensus process.
610   $acooperation.
610   $adecision making.
610   $adecision-making groups.
610   $adeliberation.
610   $adeliberative democracy.
610   $ademocracy.
610   $adescriptive representation.
610   $adisadvantaged groups.
610   $aeducation.
610   $aefficacy.
610   $aethnicity.
610   $afemale citizens.
610   $agender composition.
610   $agender differences.
610   $agender gap.
610   $agender.
610   $agovernment intervention.
610   $agroup behaviour.
610   $agroup interaction.
610   $agroup-level factors.
610   $aincome redistribution.
610   $ainequality.
610   $ainfluence.
610   $ainternational speakers.
610   $ajustice.
610   $alower confidence.
610   $amajority rule.
610   $amajority-rule meetings.
610   $ameetings.
610   $amen.
610   $aminorities.
610   $aminority status.
610   $amixed-gender combinations.
610   $amodern America.
610   $apolitical participation.
610   $apolitics.
610   $apoor populations.
610   $apoverty.
610   $apublic affairs.
610   $arace.
610   $arepresentation.
610   $aschool boards.
610   $asecond-class citizens.
610   $asilent sex.
610   $asocial group.
610   $asolidarity.
610   $aspeech.
610   $asubstantive representation.
610   $asymbolic representation.
610   $ataxes.
610   $awomen.
615  0$aCorporate meetings.
615  0$aWomen.
615  0$aSocial participation.
615  0$aSocial interaction.
615  0$aSocial groups.
615  0$aSocial psychology.
676   $a302.3/5
686   $aSOC028000$2bisacsh
700   $aKarpowitz$b Christopher F.$f1969-$01522575
702   $aMendelberg$b Tali
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910786788803321
996   $aThe silent sex$93762325
997   $aUNINA