LEADER 04464nam 22006731 450 001 9910786709903321 005 20130226153733.0 010 $a1-4725-6619-X 010 $a1-78225-037-9 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472566195 035 $a(CKB)2670000000355711 035 $a(EBL)1160320 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000873970 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12369398 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000873970 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10877518 035 $a(PQKB)10654625 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1772978 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1160320 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1772978 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10694989 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL490490 035 $a(OCoLC)893332443 035 $a(OCoLC)842936625 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09256465 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1160320 035 $a(OCoLC)843639740 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000355711 100 $a20140929d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aTransnational terrorism and state accountability $ea new theory of prevention /$fVincent-Joe?l Proulx ; with a foreword by Bruno Simma 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aOxford, United Kingdom ;$aPortland, Oregon :$cHart Publishing,$d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (379 p.) 225 1 $aHart monographs in transnational and international law ;$vv. 9 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-84946-285-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $gIntroduction --$tState responsibility, terrorism and international law --$tThe impact of 9/11 on international law and beyond --$tUnity through vagueness : the challenges of devising general rules of responsibility --$tRethinking the rationale underlying state responsibility for terrorism : trans-substantive rules, domestic analogies and the rationalist agenda --$tImplementing a two-tiered strict liability-infused model. 330 $a"Every State has an obligation to prevent terrorist attacks emanating from its territory. This proposition stems from various multilateral agreements and UN Security Council resolutions. This study exhaustively addresses the scope of this obligation of prevention and the legal consequences flowing from its violation, so as to provide greater clarity on governments' counterterrorism duties and to enhance State accountability for preventable wrongs. It defines the contents and contours of the obligation while placing critical emphasis on the mechanics of State responsibility. Whether obscured by new technologies like the Internet, the sophisticated cellular structure of some terrorist organisations or convoluted political realities, the level of governmental involvement in terrorist activities is no longer readily discernible in every instance. Furthermore, the prospect of governments waging surrogate warfare through proxies also poses intractable challenges to the mechanism of attribution in the context of State responsibility. This monograph sets out the shortcomings of the extant scheme of State responsibility while identifying a paradigm shift towards more indirect modes of accountability under international law, a trend corroborated by recent State and institutional practice. Drawing on varied legal and theoretical influences, the study devises and prescriptively argues for the implementation of a strict liability-inspired model grounded in the logic of indirect responsibility with a view to enhancing State compliance with counterterrorism obligations. This shifts the policy focus squarely to prevention, while promoting multilateralism and transnational cooperation. Ultimately, the legal and policy sensibilities underlying the book converge into a new theory of prevention in counterterrorism contexts."--Bloomsbury Publishing. 410 0$aHart monographs in transnational and international law ;$vv. 9. 606 $aGovernment liability 606 $aTerrorism$xPrevention$xLaw and legislation 606 $2International law 615 0$aGovernment liability. 615 0$aTerrorism$xPrevention$xLaw and legislation. 676 $a344.05325 700 $aProulx$b Vincent-Joe?l$0739976 702 $aSimma$b Bruno 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910786709903321 996 $aTransnational terrorism and state accountability$93728574 997 $aUNINA