LEADER 03349nam  2200625Ia 450 
001 9910786568503321
005 20220912173231.0
010   $a1-283-85448-1
010   $a90-04-23561-2
024 7 $a10.1163/9789004235618
035   $a(CKB)2670000000309427
035   $a(EBL)1081547
035   $a(OCoLC)820011209
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000784827
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11941986
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000784827
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10783020
035   $a(PQKB)10956462
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1081547
035   $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004235618
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1081547
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10631737
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL416698
035   $a(PPN)170737004
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000309427
100   $a20120710d2013      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aEarly Biblical Hebrew, late Biblical Hebrew, and linguistic variability$b[electronic resource] $ea sociolinguistic evaluation of the linguistic dating of Biblical texts /$fby Dong-Hyuk Kim
210   $aLeiden ;$aBoston $cBrill$d2013
215   $a1 online resource (202 p.)
225  0$aSupplements to Vetus Testamentum,$x0083-5889 ;$vv. 156
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a90-04-23560-4 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p.[163]-173) and index.
327   $aPreliminary Material -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Linguistic Dating of Biblical Hebrew Texts: A Survey of Scholarship -- 3. The Variation Analysis of the Hebrew Bible Corpus: The Method -- 4. Variability, Linguistic Change, and Two Types of Changes: A Theoretical Assessment -- 5. Variables of Biblical Hebrew: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Purported EBH and LBH Features -- 6. A Sociolinguistic Evaluation of the Linguistic Dating of Biblical Texts: Summary and Conclusions -- Bibliography -- Index of Authors -- Index of Scriptural References.
330   $aIn Early Biblical Hebrew, Late Biblical Hebrew, and Linguistic Variability , Dong-Hyuk Kim attempts to adjudicate between the two seemingly irreconcilable views over the linguistic dating of biblical texts. Whereas the traditional opinion, represented by Avi Hurvitz, believes that Late Biblical Hebrew was distinct from Early Biblical Hebrew and thus one can date biblical texts on linguistic grounds, the more recent view argues that Early and Late Biblical Hebrew were merely stylistic choices through the entire biblical period. Using the variationist approach of (historical) sociolinguistics and on the basis of the sociolinguistic concepts of linguistic variation and different types of language change, Kim convincingly argues that there is a third way of looking at the issue.
410  0$aVetus Testamentum, Supplements$v156.
606   $aHebrew language$xHistory
606   $aHebrew language$xVariation
615  0$aHebrew language$xHistory.
615  0$aHebrew language$xVariation.
676   $a492.4/7
676   $a492.47
700   $aKim$b Dong-Hyuk$01529947
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910786568503321
996   $aEarly Biblical Hebrew, late Biblical Hebrew, and linguistic variability$93774533
997   $aUNINA