LEADER 05576nam 2200673 450 001 9910786560203321 005 20230803202525.0 010 $a90-272-7031-7 035 $a(CKB)3710000000114508 035 $a(EBL)1693174 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001194714 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12403407 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001194714 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11155459 035 $a(PQKB)11201937 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1693174 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10874715 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL611630 035 $a(OCoLC)881103664 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1693174 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000114508 100 $a20140602h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aUsage-based approaches to Japanese grammar $etowards the understanding of human language /$fedited by Kaori Kabata, Tsuyoshi Ono 210 1$aAmsterdam, Netherlands ;$aPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania :$cJohn Benjamins B.V,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (318 p.) 225 0 $aStudies in Language Companion Series (SLCS),$x0165-7763 ;$vVolume 156 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-5921-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aUsage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Acknowledgement; List of contributors; Situating usage-based (Japanese) linguistics; 1. Introduction; 2. Themes in usage-based linguistics; 2.1 Universals and cross-linguistic orientation; 2.2 External factors and interdisciplinary orientation; 2.3 Parting from intuition; 2.4 Non-discrete nature of linguistic categories; 2.5 No division between synchrony and diachrony; 3. Preview of the articles; References; Part 1.Cognition and language use; Subordination and information status 327 $a1. Introduction 2. Foreground vs. background information; 3. Degree of subordination; 4. Object complement clause in Japanese; 4.1 Overview; 4.2 To vs. Koto: Syntactic differences and degree of subordination; 4.3 To vs. Koto: Functional differences; 5. Conclusion; List of abbreviations; References; On state of mind and grammatical forms from functional perspectives; 1. Introduction; 2. Grammar and usage of garu and te-iru; 2.1 Garu; 2.2 Te-iru; 2.3 The commonality of garu and te-iru; 3. Theoretical justification; 4. Concluding remarks; Appendix; Samples; References 327 $aGrammar of the internal expressive sentences in Japanese 1. Japanese scholarship on the internal expressive sentence; 2. The nature of the internal expressive sentence; 2.1 Expressive and descriptive sentences; 2.2 Three semantic primitives of an expressive sentence; 2.3 Interim summary; 3. Grammar of internal expressive sentences and the neurological processes; 3.1 Reflex expression; 3.2 One-term expressions; 3.3 Two-term expressions; 4. External descriptive sentences - revisited; 5. Summary; 6. Discussion and conclusion; References; Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and Japanese grammar 327 $a1. Introduction 2. Subjectivity vs. intersubjectivity; 2.1 Predicate order; 2.2 Mental vs. speech act verb dichotomy; 2.3 Unidirectionality in grammaticalization; 3. On the fundamentality of subjectivity and intersubjectivity; 4. Conclusion; Abbreviations; References; What typology reveals about modality in Japanese; 1. Introduction; 2. Revisiting the semantic and formal categories of modality in Japanese: A cross-linguistic assessment; 2.1 Modality and its formal coding in linguistic typology; 2.2 Modality and its formal coding in Japanese 327 $a3. Modality and its formal coding in Japanese, Korean, English, and German 3.1 Modal systems in Japanese, Korean, English, and German; 3.2 Mood in Japanese, Korean, German, and English; 3.3 Discourse systems in Japanese, Korean, English, and German; 4. Why does Japanese have the distribution of modality categories it has? A communicative-discursive perspective; 5. Conc lusion and implications for grammar; Abbreviations; References; Part 2.Frequency, interaction and language use; If rendaku isn't a rule, what in the world is it?; 1. Introduction; 2. Fundamental irregularity; 3. Lyman's Law 327 $a4. Direct object + verb stem 330 $aIt is often said that language standardization has been steadily advancing in modern Japan and that speakers in regional Japan are now bi-dialectal and code-switch between "Standard" and "regional" Japanese. The notion of code-switching, however, assumes the existence of varieties, or well-defined linguistic systems, that are distinct from each other. In this study, I examine the use of "Standard Japanese" and "regional dialects" and argue that it is much more complex and dynamic than what can be possibly accounted for in terms of the notion of code-switching involving two distinct varieties. 410 0$aStudies in Language Companion Series 606 $aJapanese language$xUsage 606 $aJapanese language$xSpoken Japanese 606 $aJapanese language$xWriting 615 0$aJapanese language$xUsage. 615 0$aJapanese language$xSpoken Japanese. 615 0$aJapanese language$xWriting. 676 $a495.65 702 $aKabata$b Kaori 702 $aOno$b Tsuyoshi 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910786560203321 996 $aUsage-based approaches to Japanese grammar$93774453 997 $aUNINA