LEADER 04545nam 22004693u 450 001 9910786514503321 005 20230803203942.0 010 $a0-8330-8241-8 035 $a(CKB)3710000000213057 035 $a(EBL)1680681 035 $a(OCoLC)879298241 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1680681 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000213057 100 $a20141013d2014|||| u|| | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 200 10$aFinal Report$b[electronic resource] $eEvaluation of Tools and Metrics to Support Employer Selection of Health Plans 210 $aSanta Monica $cRAND Corporation$d2014 215 $a1 online resource (92 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 327 $aCover; Title page; Copyright; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Background: The Role of Employers Under the National Quality Strategy; 1.2 Purpose of the Report; 2. Technical Approach; 2.1 Development of Conceptual Framework; 2.2 Environmental Scan; 2.3 Expert Panel Meeting; 2.4 Interviews with Employers and Business Coalition Representatives; 3. Conceptual Framework; 3.1 Understanding the Anatomy of a Health Plan; 3.2 Defining Care Processes for Measurement Purposes; 3.3 Defining Outcomes for Measurement Purposes 327 $a3.4 Measuring Quality of Health Care4. Provider-Facing Structural Characteristics of Health Plans; 4.1 Network Management; 4.2 Payment Arrangements; 5. Member-Facing Structural Characteristics of Health Plans; 5.1 Customer Service; 5.2 Cost-Sharing Provisions; 5.3 Care Management; Products and Services for Chronic Condition Management; Products and Services for Curative Care; Products and Services for Health Promotion; 5.4 Evaluation of Member-Facing Characteristics of Health Plans; 6. Process Measures; 6.1 Safe Practices; Definition; State of Measurement Science 327 $a6.2 Adherence to Evidence-Based Care GuidelinesDefinition; State of Measurement Science; 6.3 Overuse of Medical Services; Definition; State of Measurement Science; 6.4 Evaluation of Current State of Process Quality Measurement; 7. Outcomes Measures; 7.1 Medical Outcomes; Definition; State of Measurement Science; 7.2 Patient-Centeredness; Definition; State of Measurement Science; 7.3 Efficiency; Definition; State of Measurement Science; 7.4 Evaluation of Current State of Outcomes Measurement; 8. State of Practice in Employer Decisionmaking About Health Plans; 8.1 Information Sources 327 $aDecision ToolsEmployer Coalitions; Benefits Consultants; Evaluation of Tools and Resources to Support Employer Decisionmaking; 8.2 Decision Criteria for Health Plan Selection; Cost Is the Primary Driver; Employers Aim to Ensure Network Adequacy; General Reputation of Plans Influences Purchasing Decisions; Quality of a Health Plan Is Rarely Factored Explicitly into Decisions; Quality-Enhancing Products and Services Are Considered Low Priority; 9. Conclusions; 9.1 Current State of Measurement Science; 9.2 Current State of Employer Decision Tools Regarding Quality of Care 327 $a9.3 Current State of Employer Decision Process for Quality of Care9.4 Implications for Research Agenda; Appendix A: Description of Summary of Benefits and Coverage and Glossary of Terms; Appendix B: Description of Search Strategies and Tools; Appendix C: Descriptions of Quality Measurement and Reporting Organizations; Appendix D: Descriptions of Quality Measurement and Reporting Organizations; References 330 $aThe Affordable Care Act places strong emphasis on quality of care as a means to improve outcomes for Americans and promote the financial sustainability of our health care system. This report attempts to help employers understand the structural differences between health plans and the performance dimensions along which plans can differ, as well as to educate employers about available tools that can be used to evaluate plan options. 606 $aHealth insurance -- United States 606 $aHealth maintenance organizations -- United States 615 4$aHealth insurance -- United States. 615 4$aHealth maintenance organizations -- United States. 676 $a368.38 676 $a368.38/200973 700 $aMattke$b Soeren$0851848 701 $aVan Busum$b Kristin R$01559414 701 $aMartsolf$b Grant$01181978 801 0$bAU-PeEL 801 1$bAU-PeEL 801 2$bAU-PeEL 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910786514503321 996 $aFinal Report$93824488 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04097nam 22010573a 450 001 9910367561103321 005 20250203232820.0 010 $a9783748903758$b(epdf) 010 $a3748903758 010 $a9783848762699$b(print) 010 $a3848762692 035 $a(CKB)4100000009946515 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/45159 035 $a(ScCtBLL)295138fb-06b5-49e4-9468-4b06c77bdffe 035 $a(OCoLC)1139864495 035 $a(oapen)doab45159 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000009946515 100 $a20250203i20192019 uu 101 0 $ager 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aDigitale Marktmacht$fMaximilian Volmar 205 $a1 ed. 210 $cNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG$d2019 210 1$aBaden-Baden :$cNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG,$d2019. 215 $a1 electronic resource (481 p.) 225 0 $aWirtschaftsrecht und Wirtschaftspolitik ;$vBd. 301 320 $aBibliography: p. 463-481. 330 $a Der wachsende Einfluss der Internetplattformen des 21. Jahrhunderts in wirtschaftlicher, gesellschaftlicher und politischer Hinsicht hat eine Diskussion über die angemessene Regulierung dieser Konzerne ausgelöst. Im Zentrum dieser Debatte steht das Kartellrecht - das Rechtsgebiet, das zur Kontrolle marktbeherrschender Unternehmen geschaffen wurde. Die Bestimmung des im Kartellrecht fundamentalen Begriffes der marktbeherrschenden Stellung steht in der Rechtsanwendung bei Internetplattformen vor zahlreichen Herausforderungen, von der Unentgeltlichkeit der Leistungen bis hin zur Mehrseitigkeit der Geschäftsmodelle. Die vorliegende Arbeit zerlegt den Begriff der marktbeherrschenden Stellung in seine Teile und zeigt auf, inwiefern die Methodik einer Anpassung an die digitale Wirtschaft bedarf. Dies geschieht unter Einbeziehung der Erkenntnisse der Rechtsökonomie sowie der Rechtsordnungen Deutschlands, der Europäischen Union und der USA. 606 $aDroit de la concurrence$9fre$2ECLAS 606 $acompetition law$9eng$2eurovoc 606 $aUE/CE Droit$9fre$2ECLAS 606 $aEU law$9eng$2eurovoc 606 $aEntentes$9fre$2ECLAS 606 $acartel$9eng$2eurovoc 606 $aPosition dominante$9fre$2ECLAS 606 $adominant position$9eng$2eurovoc 606 $aMonopoles$9fre$2ECLAS 606 $amonopoly$9eng$2eurovoc 606 $aInternet$9eng$2eurovoc 606 $aCommerce électronique$9fre$2ECLAS 606 $aelectronic commerce$9eng$2eurovoc 606 $aThèses$9fre$2ECLAS 606 $athesis$9eng$2eurovoc 606 $aUE/CE Union européenne$9fre$2ECLAS 606 $aEuropean Union$9eng$2eurovoc 606 $aGermany$9eng$2eurovoc 606 $aUnited States$9eng$2eurovoc 607 $aAllemagne RF$9fre$2ECLAS 607 $aEtats-Unis d'Amérique$9fre$2ECLAS 610 $aWirtschaftsrecht 610 $aGoogle 610 $aWettbewerbsrecht 610 $aOnline-Plattformen 610 $aMarktmachtmissbrauch 610 $aKartellrecht 610 $aMarkt 610 $aMacht 610 $aGAFA 610 $aAmazon 610 $aFacebook 610 $aWettbewerb 610 $aInternetplattformen 615 7$aDroit de la concurrence 615 7$acompetition law 615 7$aUE/CE Droit 615 7$aEU law. 615 7$aEntentes 615 7$acartel. 615 7$aPosition dominante 615 7$adominant position 615 7$aMonopoles 615 7$amonopoly. 615 7$aInternet. 615 7$aCommerce électronique 615 7$aelectronic commerce. 615 7$aThèses 615 7$athesis 615 7$aUE/CE Union européenne 615 7$aEuropean Union. 615 7$aGermany. 615 7$aUnited States. 700 $aVolmar$b Maximilian$0960863 801 0$bScCtBLL 801 1$bScCtBLL 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910367561103321 996 $aDigitale Marktmacht$92178205 997 $aUNINA