LEADER 04124oam 2200685I 450 001 9910786049103321 005 20230803025119.0 010 $a1-136-15942-8 010 $a1-283-97284-0 010 $a0-203-07928-0 010 $a1-136-15943-6 024 7 $a10.4324/9780203079287 035 $a(CKB)2670000000325631 035 $a(EBL)1114725 035 $a(OCoLC)827208880 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000821894 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12426945 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000821894 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10880869 035 $a(PQKB)11376644 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1114725 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1114725 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10650270 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL428534 035 $a(OCoLC)826065188 035 $a(OCoLC)828741735 035 $a(FINmELB)ELB133154 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000325631 100 $a20180706d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe European Court of Human Rights in the post-Cold War era $euniversality in transition /$fJames A. Sweeney 210 1$aAbingdon, Oxon [U.K.] ;$aNew York :$cRoutledge,$d2013. 215 $a1 online resource (289 p.) 225 1 $aRoutledge research in human rights law 225 0$aRoutledge research in human rights law 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-138-80965-9 311 $a0-415-54433-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $apt. I. Concepts -- pt. II. Cases -- pt. III. Conclusions. 330 $a"The European Court of Human Rights has been a vital part of European democratic consolidation and integration for over half a century, setting meaningful standards and offering legal remedies to the individually repressed, the politically vulnerable, and the socially excluded. After their emancipation from Soviet influence in the 1990s, and with membership of the European Union in mind for many, the new democracies of Central and Eastern Europe flocked to the Convention system. However, now the "gold rush" is over, the court's position in the "New Europe" is under threat. Its ability to decide cases promptly is almost fatally compromised, and the reform of its institutional architecture is effectively blocked by Russia. The time is right to take stock, to benefit from hindsight, and to consider how the court can respond to the situation. This book examines the case law of the European Court of Human Rights with particular reference to democratic transitions in Europe and the consequent enlargement of the European Convention system. Focusing firmly on the substantive jurisprudence of the court, the book analyses how it has responded to the difficult and distinct circumstances presented by the new contracting parties. Faced with different stages of, and commitments to, democratic transition, how has the court reacted to such diversity whilst maintaining the universality of human rights, and how is this reflected in its judgments? The book tackles this question by matching rigorous doctrinal analysis of the case law with new developments in critical thinking. The cases are viewed through the prism of jurisprudence and political philosophy, with links made to European political integration and other international human rights systems. The book offers an original explanation of the court's predicament by drawing upon "thick" and "thin" notions of morality and tying this to notions of essential contestability."-$cProvided by publisher. 410 0$aRoutledge Research in Human Rights Law 606 $aUniversal jurisdiction 606 $aHuman rights 615 0$aUniversal jurisdiction. 615 0$aHuman rights. 676 $a341.4/8094 686 $aLAW000000$aLAW013000$aLAW016000$2bisacsh 700 $aSweeney$b James A.$088906 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910786049103321 996 $aThe European Court of Human Rights in the post-Cold War era$93706516 997 $aUNINA